Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38711069›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Refraining from closed reduction of displaced distal radius fractures in the emergency department-in short: the RECORDED trial.

B M Derksen, P A Jawahier, O Wijers, S P Knops, M R de Vries, C C Drijfhout van Hooff, M H J Verhofstad, N W L Schep

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

B M DerksenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. DerksenB@maasstadziekenhuis.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2992-4728
P A JawahierDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
O WijersDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
S P KnopsDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M R de VriesDepartment of Trauma Surgery, IJsselland Hospital Rotterdam, Capelle Aan Den IJssel, the Netherlands.
C C Drijfhout van HooffDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
M H J VerhofstadDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
N W L SchepDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith roughly 45,000 adult patients each year, distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in the emergency department. Approximately 60% of all these fractures are displaced and require surgery. The current guidelines advise to perform closed reduction of these fractures awaiting surgery, as it may lead to post-reduction pain relief and release tension of the surrounding neurovascular structures. Recent studies have shown that successful reduction does not warrant conservative treatment, while patients find it painful or even traumatizing. The aim of this study is to determine whether closed reduction can be safely abandoned in these patients.

methodsIn this multicenter randomized clinical trial, we will randomize between closed reduction followed by plaster casting and only plaster casting. Patients aged 18 to 75 years, presenting at the emergency department with a displaced distal radial fracture and requiring surgery according to the attending surgeon, are eligible for inclusion. Primary outcome is pain assessed with daily VAS scores from the visit to the emergency department until surgery. Secondary outcomes are function assessed by PRWHE, length of stay at the emergency department, length of surgery, return to work, patient satisfaction, and complications. A total of 134 patients will be included in this study with follow-up of 1 year. DISCUSSION: If our study shows that patients who did not receive closed reduction experience no significant drawbacks, we might be able to reorganize the initial care for distal radial fractures in the emergency department. If surgery is warranted, the patient can be sent home with a plaster cast to await the call for admission, decreasing the time spend in the emergency room drastically.

trial registrationThis trial was registered on January 27, 2023.

Indexed as

Casts, SurgicalClosed Fracture ReductionEmergency Service, HospitalWrist FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionClosed reductionCost-effectivenessDistal radius fractureSurgery

Identifiers

PMID38711069
PMCPMC11075287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.