SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2024
The predictive accuracy of machine learning for the risk of death in HIV patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for diabetic nephropathy among type 2 diabetes patients in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- AI for Prognosis Among People Living With HIV: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Advancing Human-Centered AI in Clinical Decision Support: Sociocognitive Human-in-the-Loop Study in HIV Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Mortality Prediction Among People Living With HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy in Public Health Facilities in Gondar City Administration, Northwest Ethiopia: Machine Learning-Based Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Federated Learning Performance Depends on Site Variation in Global HIV Data Consortia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Predicting immune reconstitution after antiretroviral therapy in HIV/AIDS using ensemble machine learning: a real-world study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Digital twin technology for HIV patient virtual modeling: a novel approach to treatment optimization.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Survival prediction models for people living with HIV based on four machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Scalable and robust machine learning framework for HIV classification using clinical and laboratory data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictive survival modelings for HIV-related cryptococcosis: comparing machine learning approaches.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- AI applications in HIV research: advances and future directions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of mortality risk in AIDS patients with comorbid common AIDS-related diseases or symptoms.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Visualizing and Analyzing Global Trends and Frontier Research in HIV Reservoirs: A Bibliometric Study from 1994 to 2023.Current HIV research · 2025Article
- STI/HIV risk prediction model development-A novel use of public data to forecast STIs/HIV risk for men who have sex with men.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Interpretable machine learning prediction of in-hospital mortality in people with HIV: A cohort study in southeastern China.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly prediction of mortality in individuals with HIV (PWH) has perpetually posed a formidable challenge. With the widespread integration of machine learning into clinical practice, some researchers endeavor to formulate models predicting the mortality risk for PWH. Nevertheless, the diverse timeframes of mortality among PWH and the potential multitude of modeling variables have cast doubt on the efficacy of the current predictive model for HIV-related deaths. To address this, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis, aiming to comprehensively assess the utilization of machine learning in the early prediction of HIV-related deaths and furnish evidence-based support for the advancement of artificial intelligence in this domain.
methodsWe systematically combed through the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases on November 25, 2023. To evaluate the bias risk in the original studies included, we employed the Predictive Model Bias Risk Assessment Tool (PROBAST). During the meta-analysis, we conducted subgroup analysis based on survival and non-survival models. Additionally, we utilized meta-regression to explore the influence of death time on the predictive value of the model for HIV-related deaths.
resultsAfter our comprehensive review, we analyzed a total of 24 pieces of literature, encompassing data from 401,389 individuals diagnosed with HIV. Within this dataset, 23 articles specifically delved into deaths during long-term follow-ups outside hospital settings. The machine learning models applied for predicting these deaths comprised survival models (COX regression) and other non-survival models. The outcomes of the meta-analysis unveiled that within the training set, the c-index for predicting deaths among people with HIV (PWH) using predictive models stands at 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91). In the validation set, the c-index is slightly lower at 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85). Notably, the meta-regression analysis demonstrated that neither follow-up time nor the occurrence of death events significantly impacted the performance of the machine learning models.
conclusionsThe study suggests that machine learning is a viable approach for developing non-time-based predictions regarding HIV deaths. Nevertheless, the limited inclusion of original studies necessitates additional multicenter studies for thorough validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.