Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38711068›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2024

The predictive accuracy of machine learning for the risk of death in HIV patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuefei Li, Ying Feng, Qian He, Zhen Ni, Xiaoyuan Hu, Xinhuan Feng, Mingjian Ni

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuefei Li *Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830011, China.
Ying Feng *Urumqi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, China.
Qian HePublic Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830011, China.
Zhen NiSTD/HIV Prevention and Control Center, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 138 Jianquan 1st Street, Tianshan District, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830002, China.
Xiaoyuan HuSTD/HIV Prevention and Control Center, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 138 Jianquan 1st Street, Tianshan District, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830002, China.
Xinhuan FengClinical Laboratory, Second People's Hospital of Yining, Yining, Xinjiang, 835000, China.
Mingjian NiSTD/HIV Prevention and Control Center, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 138 Jianquan 1st Street, Tianshan District, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830002, China. xjnmj@126.com.

Funding

Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project: Xinjiang HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control Research Key Laboratory XJYS1706National "13th Five-Year Plan" Major Science and Technology Project 2018ZX10715-007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly prediction of mortality in individuals with HIV (PWH) has perpetually posed a formidable challenge. With the widespread integration of machine learning into clinical practice, some researchers endeavor to formulate models predicting the mortality risk for PWH. Nevertheless, the diverse timeframes of mortality among PWH and the potential multitude of modeling variables have cast doubt on the efficacy of the current predictive model for HIV-related deaths. To address this, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis, aiming to comprehensively assess the utilization of machine learning in the early prediction of HIV-related deaths and furnish evidence-based support for the advancement of artificial intelligence in this domain.

methodsWe systematically combed through the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases on November 25, 2023. To evaluate the bias risk in the original studies included, we employed the Predictive Model Bias Risk Assessment Tool (PROBAST). During the meta-analysis, we conducted subgroup analysis based on survival and non-survival models. Additionally, we utilized meta-regression to explore the influence of death time on the predictive value of the model for HIV-related deaths.

resultsAfter our comprehensive review, we analyzed a total of 24 pieces of literature, encompassing data from 401,389 individuals diagnosed with HIV. Within this dataset, 23 articles specifically delved into deaths during long-term follow-ups outside hospital settings. The machine learning models applied for predicting these deaths comprised survival models (COX regression) and other non-survival models. The outcomes of the meta-analysis unveiled that within the training set, the c-index for predicting deaths among people with HIV (PWH) using predictive models stands at 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91). In the validation set, the c-index is slightly lower at 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85). Notably, the meta-regression analysis demonstrated that neither follow-up time nor the occurrence of death events significantly impacted the performance of the machine learning models.

conclusionsThe study suggests that machine learning is a viable approach for developing non-time-based predictions regarding HIV deaths. Nevertheless, the limited inclusion of original studies necessitates additional multicenter studies for thorough validation.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMachine LearningHumansRisk AssessmentHIVMeta-analysisPredictive modelRisk of deathSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38711068
PMCPMC11075245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.