Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38711031›Full record

ReviewBMC primary care2024

Harmonization of clinical practice guidelines for primary prevention and screening: actionable recommendations and resources for primary care.

Carolina Fernandes, Denise Campbell-Scherer, Aisha Lofters, Eva Grunfeld, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Heidi Cheung, Katherine Latko, Wendy Tink, Richard Lewanczuk, Melissa Shea-Budgell and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Carolina Fernandes *Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. carolina.fernandes@ualberta.ca.
Denise Campbell-Scherer *Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Aisha Lofters *Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eva Grunfeld *Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kris Aubrey-Bassler *Discipline of Family Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Heidi Cheung *Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Katherine Latko *College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Wendy Tink *Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Richard Lewanczuk *Alberta Health Services, Alberta, AB, Canada.
Melissa Shea-Budgell *Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ruth Heisey *Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tracy Wong *Strategic Clinical Networks, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Huiming Yang *Alberta Health Services, Alberta, AB, Canada.
Sakina Walji *Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Margo Wilson *Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Elizabeth Holmes *Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kelly Lang-Robertson *Centre for Effective Practice, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christina DeLonghi *Centre for Effective Practice, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Donna Patricia Manca *Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

Alberta Innovates 201500833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) synthesize high-quality information to support evidence-based clinical practice. In primary care, numerous CPGs must be integrated to address the needs of patients with multiple risks and conditions. The BETTER program aims to improve prevention and screening for cancer and chronic disease in primary care by synthesizing CPGs into integrated, actionable recommendations. We describe the process used to harmonize high-quality cancer and chronic disease prevention and screening (CCDPS) CPGs to update the BETTER program.

methodsA review of CPG databases, repositories, and grey literature was conducted to identify international and Canadian (national and provincial) CPGs for CCDPS in adults 40-69 years of age across 19 topic areas: cancers, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, hepatitis C, obesity, osteoporosis, depression, and associated risk factors (i.e., diet, physical activity, alcohol, cannabis, drug, tobacco, and vaping/e-cigarette use). CPGs published in English between 2016 and 2021, applicable to adults, and containing CCDPS recommendations were included. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool and a three-step process involving patients, health policy, content experts, primary care providers, and researchers was used to identify and synthesize recommendations.

resultsWe identified 51 international and Canadian CPGs and 22 guidelines developed by provincial organizations that provided relevant CCDPS recommendations. Clinical recommendations were extracted and reviewed for inclusion using the following criteria: 1) pertinence to primary prevention and screening, 2) relevance to adults ages 40-69, and 3) applicability to diverse primary care settings. Recommendations were synthesized and integrated into the BETTER toolkit alongside resources to support shared decision-making and care paths for the BETTER program.

conclusionsComprehensive care requires the ability to address a person's overall health. An approach to identify high-quality clinical guidance to comprehensively address CCDPS is described. The process used to synthesize and harmonize implementable clinical recommendations may be useful to others wanting to integrate evidence across broad content areas to provide comprehensive care. The BETTER toolkit provides resources that clearly and succinctly present a breadth of clinical evidence that providers can use to assist with implementing CCDPS guidance in primary care.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CarePrimary PreventionAdultAgedCanadaChronic DiseaseHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasmsChronic diseaseClinical practice guidelinesPreventionPrimary careScreening

Identifiers

PMID38711031
PMCPMC11071261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.