Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38710942›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2024

Endoplasmic reticulum stress is attenuated by glycolysis in lymphatic malformations.

Xuecong Li, Wenqun Zhong, Hao Jiang, Peipei Wang, Maosheng Chai, Tianshuang Zhu, Jingjing Liu, Congfa Huang, Shaodong Yang, Dongsheng Mou and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xuecong Li *State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wenqun Zhong *State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hao Jiang *State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Peipei WangState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Maosheng ChaiState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Tianshuang ZhuState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Jingjing LiuState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Congfa HuangState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Shaodong YangState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Dongsheng MouWuhan Conform Pharm Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoshun ZhouWuhan Conform Pharm Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Yu CaiState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. caiyu_20012@whu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-1218-2652

Funding

National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to investigate the role of endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) in human dermal lymphatic endothelial cells (HDLECs) and lymphatic malformations (LMs) and its relationship with aerobic glycolysis and inflammation.

methodsThe proliferation and apoptosis of HDLECs were examined with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment. ER stress-associated proteins and glycolysis-related markers were detected by western blot. Glycolysis indexes were detected by seahorse analysis and lactic acid production assay kits. Immunohistochemistry was used to reveal the ER stress state of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) in LMs.

resultsLPS induced ER stress in HDLECs but did not trigger detectable apoptosis. Intriguingly, LPS-treated HDLECs also showed increased glycolysis flux. Knockdown of Hexokinase 2, a key enzyme for aerobic glycolysis, significantly inhibited the ability of HDLECs to resist ER stress-induced apoptosis. Moreover, compared to normal skin, glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78/BIP), and phosphorylation protein kinase R-like kinase (p-PERK), two key ER stress-associated markers, were upregulated in LECs of LMs, which was correlated with the inflected state. In addition, excessively activated ER stress inhibited the progression of LMs in rat models.

conclusionsThese data indicate that glycolysis could rescue activated ER stress in HDLECs, which is required for the accelerated development of LMs. IMPACT: Inflammation enhances both ER stress and glycolysis in LECs while glycolysis is required to attenuate the pro-apoptotic effect of ER stress. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is activated in lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) of LMs, especially in inflammatory condition. The expression of ER stress-related proteins is increased in LMs and correlated with Hexokinase 2 expression. Pharmacological activation of ER stress suppresses the formation of LM lesions in the rat model. ER stress may be a promising and effective therapeutic target for the treatment of LMs.

Indexed as

ApoptosisEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPEndoplasmic Reticulum StressEndothelial CellsGlycolysisHexokinaseAnimalsCell ProliferationCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimaleIF-2 KinaseHeat-Shock ProteinsHumansInflammationLipopolysaccharidesLymphatic AbnormalitieseIF-2 KinaseEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsHexokinaseHK2 protein, humanHSPA5 protein, humanLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.