Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38710801›Full record

SynthesisInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2024

Effects of work-directed interventions on return-to-work in people on sick-leave for to common mental disorders-a systematic review.

Elisabeth Brämberg, Elizabeth Åhsberg, Gunilla Fahlström, Elisabet Furberg, Carl Gornitzki, Anna Ringborg, Peter Skogman Thoursie

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisabeth BrämbergUnit of Intervention- and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. Elisabeth.bjork.bramberg@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-5144
Elizabeth ÅhsbergSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU), Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4376-5188
Gunilla FahlströmSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU), Stockholm, Sweden.
Elisabet FurbergDepartment of Philosophy, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl GornitzkiSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU), Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna RingborgSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU), Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter Skogman ThoursieDepartment of Economics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Statens beredning för medicinsk och social utvärdering SBU 2022/494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the body of evidence of the effects of work-directed interventions on return-to-work for people on sick leave due to common mental disorders (i.e., mild to moderate depression, anxiety, adjustment disorders and reactions to severe stress).

methodsThe systematic review was conducted in accordance with an a priori developed and registered protocol (Prospero CRD42021235586). The certainty of evidence was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

resultsWe reviewed 14,794 records published between 2015 and 2021. Of these, eight RCTs published in eleven articles were included in the analysis. POPULATION: Working age adults (18 to 64 years), on sick leave due to mild to moderate depression, anxiety, adjustment disorders or reactions to severe stress.

interventionWork-directed interventions. COMPARATOR: No comparator, Standard care, or other measures. OUTCOME: return to work, number of days on sick leave, income. Overall, the effects of work-focused CBT and work-focused team-based support on RTW resulted in increased or faster return-to-work compared with standard care or no intervention (low certainty of evidence). The effects of Individual Placement and Support showed no difference in RTW compared with standard care (very low certainty of evidence).

conclusionInterventions involving the workplace could increase the probability of RTW. Areas in need of improvement in the included studies, for example methodological issues, are discussed. Further, suggestions are made for improving methodological rigor when conducting large scale trials.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersReturn to WorkSick LeaveAdolescentAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultAdjustment disorderAnxietyDepressionReactions to severe stressReturn-to-workSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38710801
PMCPMC11245426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.