ArticleScientific reports2024
Nonlinear mechanical response analysis and convolutional neural network enabled diagnosis of single-span rotor bearing system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A domain generalization network for imbalanced machinery fault diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The wide application of rotating machinery has boosted the development of electricity and aviation, however, long-term operation can lead to a variety of faults. The use of different measures to deal with corresponding malfunctions is the key to generating benefits, so it is significant to carry out the fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. In this work, a test bench for single-span rotor bearings was established, three faults, including spindle bending, spindle crack without end loading and spindle crack with end loading, are experimental analyzed with basic mechanical response. Moreover, a diagnosis is performed using a convolutional neural network, according to the differences in mechanical responses of the three faults obtained from experiments. For three faults, the change in the properties of spindle itself results in different axis trajectories and spectra. Compared with spindle bending fault, spindle crack fault not only cause 1×, 2×, 3× frequency component excitation, also 4×, 5× frequency component excitation. Additionally, the classification accuracy of the training set and the test set under machine learning for the three types of working conditions is 100%. This indicates that the network can significantly identify signal features so as to make effective fault classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.