Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38710783›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Application of citizen science with the nationwide bird census.

Yerim Lee, Yuno Do, Maurice Lineman, Gea-Jae Joo, Hyunbin Jo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yerim LeeDepartment of Integrated Biological Science, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Yuno DoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kongju National University, Gongju, Republic of Korea.
Maurice LinemanRCF Experimental School, Chaoyang District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Gea-Jae JooDepartment of Integrated Biological Science, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Hyunbin JoDepartment of Pet Health Care, Busan Health University, Busan, Republic of Korea. prozeva@bhu.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF- 2016R1D1A1B01009492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizen science (CS) is the most effective tool for overcoming the limitations of government and/or professional data collection. To compensate for quantitative limitations of the 'Winter Waterbird Census of Korea', we conducted a total of four bird monitoring via CS from 2021 to 2022. To use CS data alongside national data, we studied CS data quality and improvement utilizing (1) digit-based analysis using Benford's law and (2) comparative analysis with national data. In addition, we performed bird community analysis using CS-specific data, demonstrating the necessity of CS. Neither CS nor the national data adhered to Benford's law. Alpha diversity (number of species and Shannon index) was lower, and total beta diversity was higher for the CS data than national data. Regarding the observed bird community, the number of species per family was similar; however, the number of individuals per family/species differed. We also identified the necessity of CS by confirming the possibility of predicting bird communities using CS-specific data. CS was influenced by various factors, including the perceptions of the survey participants and their level of experience. Therefore, conducting CS after systematic training can facilitate the collection of higher-quality data.

Indexed as

BirdsCensusesCitizen ScienceAnimalsBiodiversityRepublic of KoreaBirdCitizen scienceData qualityNationalReliability

Identifiers

PMID38710783
PMCPMC11074294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.