Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38710538›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2024

Evaluation of the impact of prospective payment systems on cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yun Zhao, Ivan En-Howe Tan, Vikneswary D/O A Jahnasegar, Hui Min Chong, Yonghui Chen, Brian Kim Poh Goh, Marianne Kit Har Au, Ye Xin Koh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yun ZhaoGroup Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4093-4695
Ivan En-Howe TanGroup Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0000-1367
Vikneswary D/O A JahnasegarSchool of Economics, Singapore Management University, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4741-6523
Hui Min ChongGroup Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4766-2842
Yonghui ChenGroup Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3836-2782
Brian Kim Poh GohDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8218-4576
Marianne Kit Har AuGroup Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3653-0962
Ye Xin KohDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-4174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of prospective payment systems (PPSs) on cholecystectomy. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, examining studies published until December 2023. The review process focused on identifying research across major databases that reported critical outcomes such as length of stay (LOS), mortality, complications, admissions, readmissions, and costs following PPS for cholecystectomy. The studies were specifically selected for their relevance to the impact of PPS or the transition from fee-for-service (FFS) to PPS. The study analyzed six papers, with three eligible for meta-analysis, to assess the impact of the shift from FFS to PPS in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy procedures. Our findings indicated no significant changes in LOS and mortality rates following the transition from FFS to PPS. Complication rates varied and were influenced by the diagnosis-related group categorization and surgeon cost profiles under episode-based payment. There was a slight increase in admissions and readmissions, and mixed effects on hospital costs and financial margins, suggesting varied responses to PPS for cholecystectomy procedures. The impact of PPS on cholecystectomy is nuanced and varies across different aspects of healthcare delivery. Our findings indicate a need for adaptable, patient-centered PPS models that balance economic efficiency with high-quality patient care. The study emphasizes the importance of considering specific surgical procedures and patient demographics in healthcare payment reforms.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyDiagnosis-related groupEpisode-based paymentFee-for-serviceProspective payment system

Identifiers

PMID38710538
PMCPMC11341890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.