ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2024
Genetic analysis of cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurrent PIK3CA-E545K mutation promotes cervical cancer growth and invasion via AKT/mTOR signaling.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- Preoperative non-invasive prediction of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer using a multiparametric radiomics model based on transvaginal ultrasound.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- In silico analysis of driver genes in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: insights into their biological functions, prognosis, immune infiltration, and therapy.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Circular RNAs in cervical cancer: from ceRNA networks to epitranscriptomic regulation, immune modulation, and metastatic reprogramming.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Organoid technology in cervical cancer research.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Prediction of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer patients using AdaBoost machine learning model: analysis of risk factors.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- A random survival forest-based pathomics signature classifies immunotherapy prognosis and profiles TIME and genomics in ES-SCLC patients.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo find out the differences in gene characteristics between cervical cancer patients with and without lymph node metastasis, and to provide reference for therapy.
methodsFrom January 2018 to June 2022, recurrent cervical cancer patients 39 cases with lymph node metastasis and 73 cases without lymph node metastasis underwent testing of 1,021 cancer-related genes by next-generation sequencing. Maftools software was used to analyze somatic single nucleotide/insertion-deletion variation mutation, co-occurring mutation, cosmic mutation characteristics, oncogenic signaling pathways.
resultsEP300 and FBXW7 were significantly enriched in lymph node-positive patients. Lymph node-positive patients with EP300 or FBXW7 mutations had lower overall survival (OS) after recurrence. Both lymph node-positive and -negative patients had plenty of co-occurring mutations but few mutually exclusive mutations. Lymph node-positive co-occurring mutation number ≥6 had lower OS, while lymph node-negative co-occurring mutation number ≥3 had lower OS after recurrence. The etiology of SBS3 was defects in DNA double strand break repair by homologous recombination, which exclusively exist in lymph node-positive patients. There was no difference in median tumor mutation burden (TMB) between positive and negative lymph nodes, but TMB was significantly associated with PIK3CA mutation.
conclusionThe somatic SNV/Indels of EP300 and FBXW7, SBS3 homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair defect were enriched in lymph node-positive patients. For lymph node-positive patients, EP300 or FBXW7 mutations predicted poor prognosis. No matter lymph node-positive or negative, more co-occurring mutation number predicted poor prognosis. PIK3CA mutation may account for the higher TMB and help identify patients who benefit from immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.