Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2024
Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor camonsertib dose optimization in patients with biomarker-selected advanced solid tumors (TRESR study).
Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04497116 (Phase 1/2a Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Preliminary Clinical Activity of RP-3500 Alone or in Combination With Talazoparib or Gemcitabine in Advanced Solid Tumors With ATR Inhibitor Sensitizing Mutations), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 1/2a Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Preliminary Clinical Activity of RP-3500 Alone or in Combination With Talazoparib or Gemcitabine in Advanced Solid Tumors With ATR Inhibitor Sensitizing Mutations (TRESR Study)
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- BrUOG360: A Phase Ib/II Study of Copanlisib in Combination with Rucaparib in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC).Cancer research communications · 2025Trial
- Safety and efficacy of ceralasertib, an ATR kinase inhibitor, combined with olaparib: dose escalation in advanced solid tumours and dose expansion in advanced breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Paediatric therapeutic development workshop on osteosarcoma.British journal of cancer · 2026Review
- PTEN deficiency confers sensitivity to ATR inhibitor-based treatment in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Article
- Synthetic lethality in cancer: mechanism exploration and therapeutic applications.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Pathway for the Development of ATR Inhibitors in Pediatric Malignancies: An ACCELERATE Multistakeholder Analysis.JCO precision oncology · 2026Review
- Targeting DNA Damage Repair Pathways Beyond PARP Inhibition.Targeted oncology · 2025Review
- Exceptional response to the ATR inhibitor, camonsertib, in a patient with ALT+ metastatic melanoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Bridging the Gap in Breast Cancer Dormancy: Models, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Consensus, debate, and prospective on pancreatic cancer treatments.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCamonsertib is a selective oral inhibitor of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase with demonstrated efficacy in tumors with DNA damage response gene deficiencies. On-target anemia is the main drug-related toxicity typically manifesting after the period of dose-limiting toxicity evaluation. Thus, dose and schedule optimization requires extended follow-up to assess prolonged treatment effects.
methodsLong-term safety, tolerability, and antitumor efficacy of 3 camonsertib monotherapy dosing regimens were assessed in the TRESR study dose-optimization phase: 160 mg once daily (QD) 3 days on, 4 days off (160 3/4; the preliminary recommended Phase II dose [RP2D]) and two step-down groups of 120 mg QD 3/4 (120 3/4) and 160 mg QD 3/4, 2 weeks on, 1 week off (160 3/4, 2/1w). Safety endpoints included incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), dose modifications, and transfusions. Efficacy endpoints included overall response rate, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based molecular response rate.
resultsThe analysis included 119 patients: 160 3/4 (n = 67), 120 3/4 (n = 25), and 160 3/4, 2/1w (n = 27) treated up to 117.1 weeks as of the data cutoff. The risk of developing grade 3 anemia was significantly lower in the 160 3/4, 2/1w group compared with the preliminary RP2D group (hazard ratio = 0.23, 2-sided P = .02), translating to reduced transfusion and dose reduction requirements. The intermittent weekly schedule did not compromise antitumor activity.
conclusionThe 160 3/4, 2/1w dose was established as an optimized regimen for future camonsertib monotherapy studies offering a substantial reduction in the incidence of anemia without any compromise to efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL ID: NCT04497116.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.