ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2024
Stain-Free Approach to Determine and Monitor Cell Heath Using Supervised and Unsupervised Image-Based Deep Learning.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Representative training data sets are critical for accurate machine-learning classification of microscopy images of particles formed by lipase-catalyzed polysorbate hydrolysis.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-based medicinal products (CBMPs) are a growing class of therapeutics that promise new treatments for complex and rare diseases. Given the inherent complexity of the whole human cells comprising CBMPs, there is a need for robust and fast analytical methods for characterization, process monitoring, and quality control (QC) testing during their manufacture. Existing techniques to evaluate and monitor cell quality typically constitute labor-intensive, expensive, and highly specific staining assays. In this work, we combine image-based deep learning with flow imaging microscopy (FIM) to predict cell health metrics using cellular morphology "fingerprints" extracted from images of unstained Jurkat cells (immortalized human T-lymphocyte cells). A supervised (i.e., algorithm trained with human-generated labels for images) fingerprinting algorithm, trained on images of unstained healthy and dead cells, provides a robust stain-free, non-invasive, and non-destructive method for determining cell viability. Results from the stain-free method are in good agreement with traditional stain-based cytometric viability measurements. Additionally, when trained with images of healthy cells, dead cells and cells undergoing chemically induced apoptosis, the supervised fingerprinting algorithm is able to distinguish between the three cell states, and the results are independent of specific treatments or signaling pathways. We then show that an unsupervised variational autoencoder (VAE) algorithm trained on the same images, but without human-generated labels, is able to distinguish between samples of healthy, dead and apoptotic cells along with cellular debris based on learned morphological features and without human input. With this, we demonstrate that VAEs are a powerful exploratory technique that can be used as a process monitoring analytical tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.