Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2024
Capecitabine or Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (CRTCOESC): A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial.
Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07177794 (Toripalimab Combined With Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Toripalimab Combined With Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Phase III Trial (EC-CRT-008)
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Induction immunochemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves survival in unresectable esophageal cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Radiotherapy with S-1 for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 75 years or older.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Inhibition of TLR4 enhances oxaliplatin chemotherapy sensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by suppressing inflammation and glycolysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Definitive chemoradiotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: survival and progression patterns in a propensity-matched cohort.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy resistance of esophageal carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Efficacy of combined immunotherapy and predictive role of inflammatory markers in elderly ESCC patients.Future science OA · 2025Article
- Article
- Current status and perspectives of esophageal cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Review
- Salvage Chemoradiotherapy for Loco-Regional Recurrence of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Esophagectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Case Report: Radiotherapy combined with DEB-TACE for hemorrhagic locally advanced solid tumors: a report of 3 cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Improper lung volume-dose parameters are risk factors for acute fatal radiation pneumonitis among esophageal cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a case-control study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis phase 3 trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) with those of fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PF) in definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (DCRT) for inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
methodsPatients were randomly assigned to receive two cycles of capecitabine, XELOX, or PF along with concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Patients in each arm were again randomly assigned to receive two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy or not. The primary end points were 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs).
resultsA total of 246 patients were randomly assigned into the capecitabine (n = 80), XELOX (n = 85), and PF (n = 81) arms. In capecitabine, XELOX, and PF arms, the 2-year OS rate was 75%, 66.7%, and 70.9% (capecitabine
conclusionCapecitabine or XELOX did not significantly improve the 2-year OS rate over PF in DCRT for inoperable locally advanced ESCC. Capecitabine showed a lower incidence of grade ≥3 AEs than PF did.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.