Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38709929›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Nonlethal deleterious mutation-induced stress accelerates bacterial aging.

Maryam Kohram, Amy E Sanderson, Alicia Loui, Peyton V Thompson, Harsh Vashistha, Aseel Shomar, Zoltán N Oltvai, Hanna Salman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nonlethal deleterious mutation-induced stress accelerates bacterial aging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maryam KohramDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Amy E SandersonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.ORCID 0009-0003-2250-0479
Alicia LouiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Peyton V ThompsonDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Harsh VashisthaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.ORCID 0000-0002-9411-5137
Aseel ShomarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3322-2630
Zoltán N OltvaiDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.ORCID 0000-0001-7997-397X
Hanna SalmanDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.ORCID 0000-0002-5847-524X

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) DBI-1356505National Science Foundation (NSF) Phy-2014116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random mutagenesis, including when it leads to loss of gene function, is a key mechanism enabling microorganisms' long-term adaptation to new environments. However, loss-of-function mutations are often deleterious, triggering, in turn, cellular stress and complex homeostatic stress responses, called "allostasis," to promote cell survival. Here, we characterize the differential impacts of 65 nonlethal, deleterious single-gene deletions on

Indexed as

Escherichia coliStress, PhysiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalEscherichia coli ProteinsGene DeletionGene Expression Regulation, BacterialLoss of Function MutationMutationTranscriptomeEscherichia coli Proteinsadaptationmetabolismreplicative lifespanresiliencestress

Identifiers

PMID38709929
PMCPMC11098108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.