Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38709769›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Interventions promoting recovery from depression for patients transitioning from outpatient mental health services to primary care: A scoping review.

Anne Sofie Aggestrup, Frederik Martiny, Line Lund Henriksen, Annette Sofie Davidsen, Klaus Martiny

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne Sofie AggestrupThe Research Unit for Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), New Interventions in Depression (NID) Group, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2907-8074
Frederik MartinyThe Research Unit for and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7266-1981
Line Lund HenriksenThe Research Unit for Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), New Interventions in Depression (NID) Group, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Annette Sofie DavidsenThe Research Unit for and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Klaus MartinyThe Research Unit for Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), New Interventions in Depression (NID) Group, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7317-5958

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent mental disorders worldwide with significant personal and public health consequences. After an episode of MDD, the likelihood of relapse is high. Therefore, there is a need for interventions that prevent relapse of depression when outpatient mental health care treatment has ended. This scoping review aimed to systematically map the evidence and identify knowledge gaps in interventions that aimed to promote recovery from MDD for patients transitioning from outpatient mental health services to primary care. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe followed the guidance by Joanna Briggs Institute in tandem with the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Four electronic databases were systematically searched using controlled index-or thesaurus terms and free text terms, as well as backward and forward citation tracking of included studies. The search strategy was based on the identification of any type of intervention, whether simple, multicomponent, or complex. Three authors independently screened for eligibility and extracted data.

results18 studies were included for review. The studies had high heterogeneity in design, methods, sample size, recovery rating scales, and type of interventions. All studies used several elements in their interventions; however, the majority used cognitive behavioural therapy conducted in outpatient mental health services. No studies addressed the transitioning phase from outpatient mental health services to primary care. Most studies included patients during their outpatient mental health care treatment of MDD.

conclusionsWe identified several knowledge gaps. Recovery interventions for patients with MDD transitioning from outpatient mental health services to primary care are understudied. No studies addressed interventions in this transitioning phase or the patient's experience of the transitioning process. Research is needed to bridge this gap, both regarding interventions for patients transitioning from secondary to primary care, and patients' and health care professionals' experiences of the interventions and of what promotes recovery. REGISTRATION: A protocol was prepared in advance and registered in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/ah3sv), published in the medRxiv server (https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.06.22280499) and in PLOS ONE (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291559).

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderMental Health ServicesPrimary Health CareAmbulatory CareCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansOutpatients

Identifiers

PMID38709769
PMCPMC11073719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.