ArticlePloS one2024
Drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis among Nepalese patients at a tuberculosis referral center.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), characterized by isoniazid and rifampicin resistance, is caused by chromosomal mutations that restrict treatment options and complicate tuberculosis management. This study sought to investigate the prevalence of pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis, as well as mutation pattern, in Nepalese patients with MDR/rifampicin-resistant (RR)-TB strains.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on MDR/RR-TB patients at the German Nepal Tuberculosis Project from June 2017 to June 2018. The MTBDRsl line probe assay identified pre-XDR-TB and XDR-TB. Pre-XDR-TB included MDR/RR-TB with resistance to any fluoroquinolone (FLQ), while XDR-TB included MDR/RR-TB with resistance to any FLQ and at least one additional group A drug. Mutation status was determined by comparing bands on reaction zones [gyrA and gyrB for FLQ resistance, rrs for SILD resistance, and eis for low-level kanamycin resistance, according to the GenoType MTBDRsl VER 2.0, Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany definition of pre-XDR and XDR] to the evaluation sheet. SPSS version 17.0 was used for data analysis.
resultsOut of a total of 171 patients with MDR/RR-TB, 160 had (93.57%) had MTBC, of whom 57 (35.63%) had pre-XDR-TB and 10 (6.25%) had XDR-TB. Among the pre-XDR-TB strains, 56 (98.25%) were FLQ resistant, while 1 (1.75%) was SLID resistant. The most frequent mutations were found at codons MUT3C (57.14%, 32/56) and MUT1 (23.21%, 13/56) of the gyrA gene. One patient had SLID resistant genotype at the MUT1 codon of the rrs gene (100%, 1/1). XDR-TB mutation bands were mostly detected on MUT1 (30%, 3/10) of the gyrA and rrs, MUT3C (30%, 3/10) of the gyrA, and MUT1 (30%, 3/10) of the rrs.
conclusionsPre-XDR-TB had a significantly higher likelihood than XDR-TB, with different specific mutation bands present in gyrA and rrs genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.