Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38709534›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Effectiveness of Personalized Hippocampal Network-Targeted Stimulation in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Young Hee Jung, Hyemin Jang, Sungbeen Park, Hee Jin Kim, Sang Won Seo, Guk Bae Kim, Young-Min Shon, Sungshin Kim, Duk L Na

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04260724 (Prospective, Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Single Center Study on the Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04260724 naunknown statusnot on this map

Prospective, Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Single Center Study on the Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Medical CenterRan2020 to 2022Enrolled32ConditionsMild to Moderate Alzheimer DiseaseArmsTMS, sham coil stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cognitive and emotional symptoms in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A meta-analysis of the effect of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques on improving cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Young Hee JungDepartment of Neurology, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University, Goyang, Korea.
Hyemin JangDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sungbeen ParkDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Jin KimDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Won SeoDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Guk Bae KimAnymedi Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Young-Min ShonDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Sungshin KimDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Duk L NaDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a safe and promising intervention for Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective: To investigate the effect of a 4-week personalized hippocampal network-targeted rTMS on cognitive and functional performance, as well as functional connectivity in AD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial, which was sham-controlled and masked to participants and evaluators, was conducted between May 2020 and April 2022 at a single Korean memory clinic. Eligible participants were between ages 55 and 90 years and had confirmed early AD with evidence of an amyloid biomarker. Participants who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to receive hippocampal network-targeted rTMS or sham stimulation. Participants received 4-week rTMS treatment, with assessment conducted at weeks 4 and 8. Data were analyzed between April 2022 and January 2024. Interventions: Each patient received 20 sessions of personalized rTMS targeting the left parietal area, functionally connected to the hippocampus, based on fMRI connectivity analysis over 4 weeks. The sham group underwent the same procedure, excluding actual magnetic stimulation. A personalized 3-dimensional printed frame to fix the TMS coil to the optimal target site was produced. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in the AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale test (ADAS-Cog) after 8 weeks from baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes in the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) and Seoul-Instrumental Activity Daily Living (S-IADL) scales, as well as resting-state fMRI connectivity between the hippocampus and cortical areas. Results: Among 30 participants (18 in the rTMS group; 12 in the sham group) who completed the 8-week trial, the mean (SD) age was 69.8 (9.1) years; 18 (60%) were female. As the primary outcome, the change in ADAS-Cog at the eighth week was significantly different between the rTMS and sham groups (coefficient [SE], -5.2 [1.6]; P = .002). The change in CDR-SOB (-4.5 [1.4]; P = .007) and S-IADL (1.7 [0.7]; P = .004) were significantly different between the groups favoring rTMS groups. The fMRI connectivity analysis revealed that rTMS increased the functional connectivity between the hippocampus and precuneus, with its changes associated with improvements in ADAS-Cog (r = -0.57; P = .005). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated the positive effects of rTMS on cognitive and functional performance, and the plastic changes in the hippocampal-cortical network. Our results support the consideration of rTMS as a potential treatment for AD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04260724.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseHippocampusTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38709534
PMCPMC11074813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.