Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38709532›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

KRAS Allelic Variants in Biliary Tract Cancers.

Gordon Taylor Moffat, Zishuo Ian Hu, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Elisabeth Kathleen Kong, Dean Pavlick, Jeffrey S Ross, Karthikeyan Murugesan, Lawrence Kwong, Anaemy Danner De Armas, Anil Korkut and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cholangiocarcinoma 2026: status quo, unmet needs and priorities.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gordon Taylor MoffatDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zishuo Ian HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Funda Meric-BernstamDepartment of Developmental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Elisabeth Kathleen KongDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Dean PavlickFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Karthikeyan MurugesanFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Lawrence KwongDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Anaemy Danner De ArmasDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Anil KorkutDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Milind JavleDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jennifer J KnoxDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINET15LM007093 · NLM · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI Lydia E. Kavraki · 1992 to 2026
$20.8M
A novel hematopoietic stem cell populationF31CA180604 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BALCEREK, JOANNA · 2013 to 2016
$142k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA180604NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) contain several actionable molecular alterations, including FGFR2, IDH1, ERBB2 (formerly HER2), and KRAS. KRAS allelic variants are found in 20% to 30% of BTCs, and multiple KRAS inhibitors are currently under clinical investigation. Objectives: To describe the genomic landscape, co-sequence variations, immunophenotype, genomic ancestry, and survival outcomes of KRAS-mutated BTCs and to calculate the median overall survival (mOS) for the most common allelic variants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter, pooled cohort study obtained clinical and next-generation sequencing data from multiple databases between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. These databases included Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Foundation Medicine, American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE, and cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. The cohort comprised patients with BTCs who underwent genomic testing. Main Outcome and Measure: The main outcome was mOS, defined as date of diagnosis to date of death, which was measured in months. Results: A total of 7457 patients (n = 3773 males [50.6%]; mean [SD] age, 63 [5] years) with BTCs and genomic testing were included. Of these patients, 5813 had clinical outcome data available, in whom 1000 KRAS-mutated BTCs were identified. KRAS allelic variants were highly prevalent in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (28.6%) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (36.1%). Thirty-six KRAS allelic variants were identified, and the prevalence rates in descending order were G12D (41%), G12V (23%), and Q61H (8%). The variant G12D had the highest mOS of 25.1 (95% CI, 22.0-33.0) months compared with 22.8 (95% CI, 19.6-31.4) months for Q61H and 17.8 (95% CI, 16.3-23.1) months for G12V variants. The majority of KRAS-mutated BTCs (98.9%) were not microsatellite instability-high and had low tumor mutational burden (ranging from a median [IQR] of 1.2 (1.2-2.5) to a mean [SD] of 3.3 [1.3]). Immune profiling through RNA sequencing of KRAS and NRAS-mutated samples showed a pattern toward a more immune-inflamed microenvironment with higher M1 macrophage activation (0.16 vs 0.12; P = .047) and interferon-γ expression compared with wild-type tumors. The G12D variant remained the most common KRAS allelic variant in all patient ancestries. Patients with admixed American ancestry had the highest proportion of G12D variant (45.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that KRAS allelic variants were relatively common and may be potentially actionable genomic alterations in patients with BTCs, especially perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The findings add to the growing data on genomic and immune landscapes of KRAS allelic variants in BTCs and are potentially of value to the planning of specific therapies for this heterogeneous patient group.

Indexed as

AllelesBiliary Tract NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AgedCholangiocarcinomaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationRetrospective StudiesKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID38709532
PMCPMC11074811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.