Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38709480›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Some Guiding Principles for a "Simple" Correlative Light Electron Microscopy Experiment.

Elina Mäntylä, Paul Verkade

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elina MäntyläBioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Paul VerkadeSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. p.verkade@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, Correlative Multimodal Imaging (CMI) has become an "en vogue" technique and a bit of a buzzword. It entails combining information from different imaging modalities to extract more information from a sample that would otherwise not be possible from each individual technique. The best established CMI technology is correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM), which applies light and electron microscopy on the exact same sample/structure. In general, it entails the detection of fluorescently tagged proteins or structures by light microscopy and subsequently their relative intracellular localization is determined with nanometer resolution using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Here, we describe the different steps involved in a "simple" CLEM approach. We describe the overall workflow, instrumentation, and basic principles of sample preparation for a CLEM experiment exploiting stable expression of fluorescent proteins.

Indexed as

Microscopy, Electron, TransmissionAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, FluorescenceCLEMEM correlationFluorescence microscopyImmunogold labellingMultimodal imagingSample preparation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.