Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38709473›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Rapid Preparation of Living Drosophila Pupal Macrophages for Ex Vivo Imaging.

Tua Karling, Helen Weavers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tua KarlingSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Helen WeaversSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. helen.weavers@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fruit fly Drosophila is a well-established invertebrate model that enables in vivo imaging of innate immune cell (e.g., macrophage) migration and signaling at high spatiotemporal resolution within the intact, living animal. While optimized methods already exist to enable flow cytometry-based macrophage isolation from Drosophila at various stages of development, there remains a need for more rapid and gentle methods to isolate living macrophages for downstream ex vivo applications. Here, we describe techniques for rapid and direct isolation of living macrophages from mature Drosophila pupae and their downstream ex vivo preparation for live imaging and immunostaining. This strategy enables straightforward access to physiologically relevant innate immune cells, both circulating and tissue-resident populations, for subsequent imaging of signal transduction.

Indexed as

MacrophagesPupaAnimalsCell SeparationDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterFlow CytometryConfocal microscopyDrosophila melanogasterEx vivoImmunostainingInnate immune cellLive time-lapse imagingMacrophage

Identifiers

PMID38709473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.