ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2024
Cognıtıve functıons in idiopathic intracranial hypertensıon.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive impairment in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A conceptual framework and therapeutic implications.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Cerebral Venous Insufficiency as a Contributing Factor in Dementia: An Emerging Hypothesis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- High Prevalence of Small-Fiber Neuropathy in Patients with Tarlov Cysts: Toward a More Comprehensive Clinical Understanding.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCognitive problems in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is generally overlooked in the presence of disabling headache and threat to visual function. The aim of this study was to search for cognitive deficits in patients with IIH using neuropsychologic tests in addition to P300 potential recordings to assess cognition related brain activity.
methodsFifty IIH patients were examined using Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test, Stroop Test and Visual Aural Digit Span Test to measure different domains of cognition at the time of diagnosis. P300 potentials were recorded by using an oddball paradigm. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to determine anxiety and depression. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by SF-36. The results were compared with fifty healthy controls with matching age, gender and body mass index.
resultsNeuropsychologic tests revealed wide cognitive impairment including attention, working memory, executive function, naming, language, delayed recall and orientation in IIH patients. In addition, quality of life was affected in the sub-parameters of general health perceptions, emotional role functioning, vitality, mental health and bodily pain. P300 potential latencies were long and the amplitudes were reduced indicating deficits in attention and working memory. Anxiety scores were high, and health-related QoL was low mainly involving vitality, emotional and mental health. Cognitive dysfunction was not correlated with the levels of anxiety and the correlation with headache severity was mild.
conclusionA multidomain cognitive decline mainly involving attention and working memory was recorded in IIH patients. It was not correlated with anxiety and only a mild correlation with headache severity was present which may indicate a casual relationship between raised intracranial pressure and cognitive deficits. Screening is important as neuropsychological rehabilitation might be relevant in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38709464What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.