SynthesisClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2024
The effect of hyperoxia on muscle sympathetic nerve activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effect of hyperoxia on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in healthy individuals and those with cardio-metabolic diseases.
methodsA comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed until August 2022. All study designs (except reviews) were included: population (humans; apparently healthy or with at least one chronic disease); exposures (muscle sympathetic nerve activity during hyperoxia or hyperbaria); comparators (hyperoxia or hyperbaria vs. normoxia); and outcomes (muscle sympathetic nerve activity, heart rate, blood pressure, minute ventilation). Forty-nine studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis.
resultsIn healthy individuals, hyperoxia had no effect on sympathetic burst frequency (mean difference [MD] - 1.07 bursts/min; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.17, 0.04bursts/min; P = 0.06), burst incidence (MD 0.27 bursts/100 heartbeats [hb]; 95% CI - 2.10, 2.64 bursts/100 hb; P = 0.82), burst amplitude (P = 0.85), or total activity (P = 0.31). In those with chronic diseases, hyperoxia decreased burst frequency (MD - 5.57 bursts/min; 95% CI - 7.48, - 3.67 bursts/min; P < 0.001) and burst incidence (MD - 4.44 bursts/100 hb; 95% CI - 7.94, - 0.94 bursts/100 hb; P = 0.01), but had no effect on burst amplitude (P = 0.36) or total activity (P = 0.90). Our meta-regression analyses identified an inverse relationship between normoxic burst frequency and change in burst frequency with hyperoxia. In both groups, hyperoxia decreased heart rate but had no effect on any measure of blood pressure.
conclusionHyperoxia does not change sympathetic activity in healthy humans. Conversely, in those with chronic diseases, hyperoxia decreases sympathetic activity. Regardless of disease status, resting sympathetic burst frequency predicts the degree of change in burst frequency, with larger decreases for those with higher resting activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38709357What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.