ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Myocardial perfusion improvement and mechanism after percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a study of myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis.Future cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Two-Year Results of Percutaneous Endocardial Septal Radiofrequency Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The data on myocardial perfusion of the percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PIMSRA) for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HOCM) are still lacking, although PIMSRA have been proved to be of great safety and efficacy. The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the changes in myocardial perfusion after PIMSRA using myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). 27 HOCM patients treated with PIMSRA were retrospectively analyzed, and their echocardiographic parameters and perfusion parameters of MCE were collected before and 12 months after PIMSRA. A reperfusion curve was used to quantify microvascular blood volume (A), microvascular flux rate (β), and microvascular blood flow (MBF) of each segment. Then the value difference (Δ) of parameters between post- and pre-operation were calculated. Finally, the correlation between the changes in MBF and in each echocardiographic parameter was analyzed. (1) Compared with baseline, the global A, β and MBF were significantly increased in HOCM patients after PIMSRA (all P < 0.001). The β, MBF were increased in the interventricular septum (P < 0.001, respectively), and the A, β, MBF were increased in the left ventricular wall (all P < 0.001). (2) Correlation analysis showed that the ΔMBF of interventricular septum was mainly negatively correlated with the maximum interventricular septum thickness (ΔIVSTmax, r=-0.670, P < 0.001), mean interventricular septum thickness (ΔIVSTmean, r=-0.690, P < 0.001), and left ventricular mass index (ΔLVMI, r=-0.774, P < 0.001), while the ΔMBF of left ventricular wall was positively correlated with left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (ΔLVEDVI, r = 0.621, P = 0.001) and stroke volume index (ΔSVI, r = 0.810, P < 0.001). Myocardial perfusion was improved at both interventricular septum and ventricular wall in HOCM patients after PIMSRA. MCE can provide a new dimension for the efficacy evaluation to PIMSRA procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38709352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.