ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Motor function in multiple sclerosis assessed by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Investigating the Relationship Between Visual Evoked Potentials, Neurological and Neuropsychological Status in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- TMS-EEG signatures of motor network dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Correspondence of MRI and nTMS With EDSS in Multiple Sclerosis: Longitudinal Follow-Up Study.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionImpaired motor function is a major cause of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS), involving various neuroplasticity processes typically assessed by neuroimaging. This study aimed to determine whether navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) could also provide biomarkers of motor cortex plasticity in patients with MS (pwMS).
methodsnTMS motor mapping was performed for hand and leg muscles bilaterally. nTMS variables included the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), corticospinal excitability measures, and the size of cortical motor maps (CMMs). Clinical assessment included disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS), strength (MRC scale, pinch and grip), and dexterity (9-hole Pegboard Test).
resultsnTMS motor mapping was performed in 68 pwMS. PwMS with high disability (EDSS ≥ 3) had enlarged CMMs with less dense distribution of MEPs and various MEP parameter changes compared to pwMS with low disability (EDSS < 3). Patients with progressive MS had also various MEP parameter changes compared to pwMS with relapsing remitting form. MRC score correlated positively with MEP amplitude and negatively with MEP latency, pinch strength correlated negatively with CMM volume and dexterity with MEP latency.
conclusionsThis is the first study to perform 4-limb cortical motor mapping in pwMS using a dedicated nTMS procedure. By quantifying the cortical surface representation of a given muscle and the variability of MEP within this representation, nTMS can provide new biomarkers of motor function impairment in pwMS. Our study opens perspectives for the use of nTMS as an objective method for assessing pwMS disability in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38709305What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.