Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38709303›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024

Dental plaque microbiota sequence counts for microbial profiling and resistance genes detection.

Laura Veschetti, Salvatore Paiella, Maria Carelli, Francesca Zotti, Erica Secchettin, Giuseppe Malleo, Caterina Signoretto, Giorgia Zulianello, Riccardo Nocini, Anna Crovetto and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Laura VeschettiDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Salvatore PaiellaGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maria CarelliDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Francesca ZottiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Erica SecchettinGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe MalleoGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Caterina SignorettoDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giorgia ZulianelloGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Riccardo NociniDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Anna CrovettoGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Roberto SalviaGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Claudio BassiGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni MalerbaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. giovanni.malerba@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8705-8560

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shotgun metagenomics sequencing experiments are finding a wide range of applications. Nonetheless, there are still limited guidelines regarding the number of sequences needed to acquire meaningful information for taxonomic profiling and antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) identification. In this study, we explored this issue in the context of oral microbiota by sequencing with a very high number of sequences (~ 100 million), four human plaque samples, and one microbial community standard and by evaluating the performance of microbial identification and ARGs detection through a downsampling procedure. When investigating the impact of a decreasing number of sequences on quantitative taxonomic profiling in the microbial community standard datasets, we found some discrepancies in the identified microbial species and their abundances when compared to the expected ones. Such differences were consistent throughout downsampling, suggesting their link to taxonomic profiling methods limitations. Overall, results showed that the number of sequences has a great impact on metagenomic samples at the qualitative (i.e., presence/absence) level in terms of loss of information, especially in experiments having less than 40 million reads, whereas abundance estimation was minimally affected, with only slight variations observed in low-abundance species. The presence of ARGs was also assessed: a total of 133 ARGs were identified. Notably, 23% of them inconsistently resulted as present or absent across downsampling datasets of the same sample. Moreover, over half of ARGs were lost in datasets having less than 20 million reads. This study highlights the importance of carefully considering sequencing aspects and suggests some guidelines for designing shotgun metagenomics experiments with the final goal of maximizing oral microbiome analyses. Our findings suggest varying optimized sequence numbers according to different study aims: 40 million for microbiota profiling, 50 million for low-abundance species detection, and 20 million for ARG identification. KEY POINTS: • Forty million sequences are a cost-efficient solution for microbiota profiling • Fifty million sequences allow low-abundance species detection • Twenty million sequences are recommended for ARG identification.

Indexed as

BacteriaDental PlaqueMetagenomicsMicrobiotaDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMetagenomeSequence Analysis, DNAAntimicrobial resistanceExperimental designSequencing depthShotgun metagenomics

Identifiers

PMID38709303
PMCPMC11074014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.