ArticleSurgery today2024
The CONUT score is associated with the pathologic grade in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Surgery today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of preoperative nutritional status on longitudinal changes in pulmonary function and prognosis after lung cancer surgery.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Survival benefit with lobectomy vs. sublobar resection in octogenarians with clinical stage IA lung cancer.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Impact of Baseline Nutritional Status, Psychological Health, Fatigue, and Insomnia on Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNutritional scores have been reported to be useful prognostic factors for various cancers. This study evaluated the usefulness of the preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
methodsThe present study included 422 patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC who underwent complete resection at Tohoku University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2016. The patients were divided into the low-CONUT and high-CONUT groups based on their CONUT scores. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cumulative recurrence rates in the low- and high-CONUT groups were evaluated retrospectively.
resultsOne hundred forty-seven patients (34.8%) were assigned to the high-CONUT group. The high-CONUT group had a significantly worse performance status, pleural invasion, vascular invasion, and lung metastasis. In the whole cohort, the low-CONUT group showed better overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and a low cumulative recurrence rate in comparison to the high-CONUT group. There was no significant difference in prognosis or recurrence between the low- and high-CONUT groups after propensity score matching.
conclusionPatients with a high CONUT score may be at high risk of recurrence because of the high frequency of pleural invasion, vascular invasion, and lung metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.