Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2024
Gene Editing for
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
122 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of autophagy in ocular health: mechanisms, pathologies, and therapeutic strategies.Biology direct · 2026Pooled it
- AI-based clinician decision support system for diagnosis of inherited retinal diseases: a multicenter, randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Recovery of cone-mediated vision in Lebercilin associated retinal ciliopathy after gene therapy: One-year results of a phase I/II trial.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Trial
- Targeted Nanoparticle Delivery CRISPR/Cas9: overcoming biological barriers, enhancing stability, and improving therapeutic precision.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Inflammatory Markers and Disease Progression in Moderate-Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa: Longitudinal Analysis from the Retinitis Pigmentosa Progression and Inflammatory Marker Registry Study.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Review
- Deep-sequencing-guided library screening and profiling of AAV capsids in the primate retina.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- The landscape and trajectory of global CRISPR therapeutics.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Revisiting retinal and macular degeneration in the genomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Cas9 and precision editing technologies linking functional genomics to clinical translation in genetic diseases.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Full-Field Stimulus Threshold: A Key Functional Outcome Measure in Retinal Diseases and Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Phase I/II Study of NGGT001 Gene Therapy for Bietti Crystalline Dystrophy.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Phosphatase and tensin homolog: A potential target for therapeutic intervention in optic nerve regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Delivery Systems for Therapeutic Genome Editing: Challenges, Innovations, and Future Perspectives.MedComm · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Cas9: Genome Engineering and Future Vaccine Applications.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Modalities of vision restoration in optic neuropathies and retinal disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses of gene therapy-associated retinal inflammation in non-human primates.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Transthyretin Amyloidosis-From Peculiar Neuropathy to a Treatable Chronic Multisystemic Disease.Genes · 2026Review
- Prime editing in neuropsychiatric disorders: From mutation-specific target selection to clinical translation.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Review
- Metabolic and redox adaptations of the corneal endothelium: From metabolic plasticity to therapeutic opportunities.Redox biology · 2026Review
62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background
methodsWe performed a phase 1-2, open-label, single-ascending-dose study in which persons 3 years of age or older with
resultsEDIT-101 was injected in 12 adults 17 to 63 years of age (median, 37 years) at a low dose (in 2 participants), an intermediate dose (in 5), or a high dose (in 5) and in 2 children 9 and 14 years of age at the intermediate dose. At baseline, the median best corrected visual acuity in the study eye was 2.4 log
conclusionsThe safety profile and improvements in photoreceptor function after EDIT-101 treatment in this small phase 1-2 study support further research of in vivo CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to treat inherited retinal degenerations due to the IVS26 variant of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.