Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708849›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

RT: a Retrieving and Chain-of-Thought framework for few-shot medical named entity recognition.

Mingchen Li, Huixue Zhou, Han Yang, Rui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingchen LiDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Huixue ZhouDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6524-5506
Han YangDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-4322-6753
Rui ZhangDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-3585

Funding

Detecting synergistic effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for AD/ADRDR01AG078154 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUA XU, RUI ZHANG · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
A Translational Informatics Framework to Mine Efficacy and Safety of Dietary SupplementsR01AT009457 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RUI ZHANG · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
SCH: A New Computational Framework for Learning from Imbalanced Biomedical DataR01CA287413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CUI, YING, SUN, JU · 2023 to 2025
$1.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009457NCCIH NIH HHS R01AT009457NCI NIH HHS R01 CA287413NCI NIH HHS R01CA287413NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078154NIA NIH HHS R01AG078154NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis article aims to enhance the performance of larger language models (LLMs) on the few-shot biomedical named entity recognition (NER) task by developing a simple and effective method called Retrieving and Chain-of-Thought (RT) framework and to evaluate the improvement after applying RT framework. MATERIALS AND

methodsGiven the remarkable advancements in retrieval-based language model and Chain-of-Thought across various natural language processing tasks, we propose a pioneering RT framework designed to amalgamate both approaches. The RT approach encompasses dedicated modules for information retrieval and Chain-of-Thought processes. In the retrieval module, RT discerns pertinent examples from demonstrations during instructional tuning for each input sentence. Subsequently, the Chain-of-Thought module employs a systematic reasoning process to identify entities. We conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of our RT framework against 16 other models for few-shot NER tasks on BC5CDR and NCBI corpora. Additionally, we explored the impacts of negative samples, output formats, and missing data on performance.

resultsOur proposed RT framework outperforms other LMs for few-shot NER tasks with micro-F1 scores of 93.50 and 91.76 on BC5CDR and NCBI corpora, respectively. We found that using both positive and negative samples, Chain-of-Thought (vs Tree-of-Thought) performed better. Additionally, utilization of a partially annotated dataset has a marginal effect of the model performance. DISCUSSION: This is the first investigation to combine a retrieval-based LLM and Chain-of-Thought methodology to enhance the performance in biomedical few-shot NER. The retrieval-based LLM aids in retrieving the most relevant examples of the input sentence, offering crucial knowledge to predict the entity in the sentence. We also conducted a meticulous examination of our methodology, incorporating an ablation study.

conclusionThe RT framework with LLM has demonstrated state-of-the-art performance on few-shot NER tasks.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingInformation Storage and RetrievalVocabulary, Controlledchain-of-thoughtfew-shot medical named entity recognitionlanguage modelretrieving

Identifiers

PMID38708849
PMCPMC11339512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.