Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708779›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024

Benefits, challenges, and strategies related to using presumptive recommendations for HPV vaccination: A qualitative study with rural and non-rural-serving primary care professionals.

Olufeyisayo O Odebunmi, Lisa P Spees, Caitlin B Biddell, Tatenda Yemeke, Juan Yanguela, Colleen Higgins, Melissa B Gilkey, Sachiko Ozawa, Stephanie B Wheeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Olufeyisayo O OdebunmiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9734-4170
Lisa P SpeesDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5680-9330
Caitlin B BiddellDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1644-7187
Tatenda YemekeUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1489-627X
Juan YanguelaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7549-2503
Colleen HigginsUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Melissa B GilkeyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1561-1392
Sachiko OzawaLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7608-9038
Stephanie B WheelerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3399-9047

Funding

Program Project – Improving Provider Announcement Communication Training (IMPACT)P01CA250989 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI QUEEN, TARA L · 2021 to 2025
$11.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA250989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HPV vaccination coverage remains far below the national target of 80% among US adolescents, particularly in rural areas, which have vaccine uptake rates that are 10% points lower than non-rural areas on average. Primary care professionals (PCPs) can increase coverage by using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination in a way that assumes parents want to vaccinate. Through semi-structured interviews, we explored PCPs' experiences and perceptions of using presumptive recommendations in rural- and non-rural-serving primary care clinics in North Carolina. Thematic analysis revealed that most PCPs in rural and non-rural contexts used presumptive recommendations and felt the strategy was an effective and concise way to introduce the topic of HPV vaccination to parents. At the same time, some PCPs raised concerns about presumptive recommendations potentially straining relationships with certain parents, including those who had previously declined HPV vaccine or who distrust medical authority due to their past experiences with the healthcare system. PCPs dealt with these challenges by using a more open-ended approach when introducing HPV vaccination to parents. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PCPs in both rural and non-rural settings see value in using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination, but to adequately address concerns and ensure increased HPV vaccine uptake, PCPs can use simple and culturally sensitive language to ensure fully informed consent and to maintain parental trust. And to further strengthen HPV vaccine discussions, PCPs can utilize other effective HPV communication techniques, like the Announcement Approach, in discussing HPV vaccinations with hesitant parents.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchRural PopulationVaccinationAdolescentAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMalePapillomavirus Vaccinesannouncement approachHPV vaccinationHPV vaccineHPV vaccine communication stylepresumptive recommendation

Identifiers

PMID38708779
PMCPMC11085946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.