Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708742›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2024

Network analysis of DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder: considering sex differences in a large clinical sample.

Ignacio Lucas, Bernat Mora-Maltas, Roser Granero, Zsolt Demetrovics, Víctor Ciudad-Fernández, Giovanna Nigro, Marina Cosenza, Magda Rosinska, Javier Tapia, Fernando Fernández-Aranda and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ignacio LucasClinical Psychology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9426-5082
Bernat Mora-MaltasClinical Psychology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4142-3208
Roser GraneroPsychoneurobiology of Eating and Addictive Behaviours Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6308-3198
Zsolt DemetrovicsInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-7551
Víctor Ciudad-FernándezDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1366-0625
Giovanna NigroDepartment of Psychology, Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico, Caserta, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3518-2468
Marina CosenzaDepartment of Psychology, Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico, Caserta, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5813-017X
Magda RosinskaClinical Psychology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0009-9918-7592
Javier TapiaGerencia Territorial Metropolitana Sud. Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7938-1480
Fernando Fernández-ArandaClinical Psychology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2968-9898
Susana Jiménez-MurciaClinical Psychology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3596-8033

Funding

European Regional Development FundHorizon 2020 847879Plan Nacional sobre Drogas PI20/00132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe fifth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and its revised version (DSM-5-TR) propose severity levels for gambling disorder (GD) based on the number of criteria met. However, this taxonomy has some limitations. We aimed to assess the centrality of each criterion and its relationship by conducting a network analysis while considering sex differences.

methodsWe performed a network analysis with the DSM-5 criteria for GD with data from 4,203 treatment-seeking patients (3,836 men and 367 women) diagnosed with GD who sought for treatment in a general tertiary hospital which has a unit specialized in behavioral addictions.

resultsThe withdrawal criterion ("Restless or irritable when attempting to cut down or stop gambling") showed the highest centrality values in both sexes. In men, the second most central criterion was the tolerance criterion ("Needs to gamble with increasing amounts of money in order to achieve the desired excitement"); while among women, the second was the chasing losses criterion ("After losing money gambling, often returns another day to get even").

conclusionsThe most central criteria identified are associated with compulsivity-driven behaviors of the addictive process. Taking into account the high relevance and transitive capacity of withdrawal in both men and women, as well as tolerance in men, and chasing losses in women, the recognition and understanding of these symptoms are fundamental for the accurate diagnosis and severity assessment of GD.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersGamblingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex Factorschasing lossesgambling disordernetwork analysistolerancewithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID38708742
PMCPMC11536196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.