Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708199›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Elemental Composition of Commercially Available Cannabis Rolling Papers.

Derek Wright, Michelle M Jarvie, Benjamin Southwell, Carmen Kincaid, Judy Westrick, S Sameera Perera, David Edwards, Robert B Cody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Derek WrightSchool of Chemistry, Environmental, and Geosciences, Lake Superior State University, 650 W. Easterday Avenue, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan 49783, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5598-3771
Michelle M JarvieSchool of Chemistry, Environmental, and Geosciences, Lake Superior State University, 650 W. Easterday Avenue, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan 49783, United States.
Benjamin SouthwellSchool of Chemistry, Environmental, and Geosciences, Lake Superior State University, 650 W. Easterday Avenue, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan 49783, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-3289
Carmen KincaidSchool of Chemistry, Environmental, and Geosciences, Lake Superior State University, 650 W. Easterday Avenue, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan 49783, United States.
Judy WestrickLumigen Instrument Center, Wayne State University, A. Paul Schaap Chemistry Building, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States.
S Sameera PereraLumigen Instrument Center, Wayne State University, A. Paul Schaap Chemistry Building, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States.
David EdwardsJEOL USA, 11 Dearborn Road, Peabody, Massachusetts 01960, United States.
Robert B CodyJEOL USA, 11 Dearborn Road, Peabody, Massachusetts 01960, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-8530

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES020957 · NIEHS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RUDEN, DOUGLAS M · 2014 to 2021
$10.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES020957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the recent legalization of cannabis in multiple jurisdictions and widespread use as a medical treatment, there has been an increased focus on product safety and the potential impacts of contaminants on human health. One factor that has received little attention is the possible exposure to potentially hazardous levels of toxic elements from rolling (smoking) papers. The elemental composition of rolling papers is largely unregulated, with a minority of jurisdictions regulating papers only when they are part of a final cannabis product. This study reports the concentrations of 26 elements in commercially available rolling papers and estimates potential maximum exposures relative to USP232 and ICH Q3D dosages in pharmaceutical compounds. Exposure estimates indicate that the concentrations of several elements in some products, particularly Cu, Cr, and V, may present a potential hazard to frequent users. Several elements, including Ag, Ca, Ba, Cu, Ti, Cr, Sb, and possibly others, are likely present in elevated quantities in some papers due to product design and manufacturing processes. Our results further suggest that Cu-based pigments are used by a number of manufacturers and that regular use of these products might result in exposures as high as 4.5-11 times the maximum exposure limits. Further research to quantify the contribution of rolling papers to elemental exposure under realistic smoking conditions is warranted.

Identifiers

PMID38708199
PMCPMC11064008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.