Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708188›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2024

Dina Ricardo-Caldera, Lyda Espitia-Pérez, Paula A Avilés-Vergara, Álvaro J Benítez, Julio Chacón-Pacheco, Jesús Ballesteros-Correa, Ana Negrette-Oquendo, Sara Soto-De León, Catalina Tovar-Acero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dina Ricardo-CalderaGrupo de investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales y Resistencia Bacteriana, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia.
Lyda Espitia-PérezGrupo de Investigación Biomédica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia.
Paula A Avilés-VergaraGrupo de investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales y Resistencia Bacteriana, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia.
Álvaro J BenítezGrupo de investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales y Resistencia Bacteriana, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia.
Julio Chacón-PachecoGrupo de Investigación Biodiversidad Unicórdoba, Universidad de Córdoba, Montería, Colombia.
Jesús Ballesteros-CorreaGrupo de Investigación Biodiversidad Unicórdoba, Universidad de Córdoba, Montería, Colombia.
Ana Negrette-OquendoGrupo de investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales y Resistencia Bacteriana, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia.
Sara Soto-De LeónGrupo de investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales y Resistencia Bacteriana, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia.
Catalina Tovar-AceroGrupo de investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales y Resistencia Bacteriana, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trypanosoma cruzi hosts can serve as a source of infection for animals, vectors, and humans, contributing to the establishment of Chagas disease (CD) in a given area. Traditionally, the Department of Córdoba has not been considered a transmission area for CD; however, the report of several acute cases of Chagas disease highlights the importance of studying the dynamics of disease transmission in this region. This study aimed to detect T. cruzi in domestic and wild mammals in the department of Córdoba. In 2017, a cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in six villages in two municipalities in the department of Córdoba. Blood samples from dogs living in the zones were collected in EDTA vacutainer tubes for domestic mammals. Wild mammals were collected using Sherman and Tomahawk traps and mist nets in crops and peridomiciles. T. cruzi DNA was detected using the kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) variable region and the tandem repeat satellite region of T. cruzi as molecular targets. We sampled 168 dogs and 146 wild mammals. The detected prevalence of T. cruzi was 6.37%; the TcI lineage was found in

Indexed as

Chagas diseaseColombiaDogsTrypanosoma cruziWild mammals

Identifiers

PMID38708188
PMCPMC11067360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.