Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708145›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia reports

Combined thoracic erector spinae plane and inter-transverse plane blocks for awake breast surgery.

F Marrone, P F Fusco, S Paventi, M Tomei, S Failli, F Fabbri, C Pullano

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F MarroneUnit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Santo Spirito Hospital Rome Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0840-9180
P F FuscoUnit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care SS Filippo e Nicola Hospital Avezzano L'Aquila Italy.
S PaventiUnit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Santo Spirito Hospital Rome Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-5947
M TomeiUnit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Santo Spirito Hospital Rome Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2805-1915
S FailliUnit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Santo Spirito Hospital Rome Italy.
F FabbriUnit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Santo Spirito Hospital Rome Italy.
C PullanoUnit of Anaesthesia Villa Pia Clinic Rome Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women. Surgical procedures are typically performed using general anaesthesia, often complemented by regional anaesthesia to manage postoperative pain. However, avoidance of general anaesthesia for breast surgery may be desirable for clinical reasons or patient choice. It is theorised that the use of regional anaesthesia and the avoidance of volatile anaesthetics and opioid analgesia may have beneficial effects on oncological outcomes, and there is some evidence to support this. While many patients successfully undergo awake breast surgery, a limited number of anaesthetists possess direct experience of this approach, despite familiarity with regional anaesthesia techniques. Undertaking regional anaesthesia for awake breast surgery requires patient cooperation and excellent staff teamwork. Here, we present a case of a patient who underwent awake bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction. This was carried out under two 'paravertebral-by-proxy' blocks: the thoracic erector spinae plane and inter-transverse plane blocks, with intravenous sedation.

Indexed as

awake breast surgerybreast cancererector spinae planeregional anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID38708145
PMCPMC11062893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.