ArticleRSC advances2024
Novel machine learning approach toward classification model of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparative Evaluation Framework Integrating Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models with ADME-Based Pharmacokinetic Assessment for HIV-Related Compounds.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Harnessing machine learning models to repurpose drugs targeting HIV-1 integrase, protease, and reverse transcriptase.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- De Novo Molecular Design and Bioactivity Prediction of Novel Hexahydroquinolines asBioinformatics and biology insights · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in human immunodeficiency virus mutation prediction and drug design: Advancing personalized treatment and prevention.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2025Review
- Article
- Innovative virtual screening of PD-L1 inhibitors: the synergy of molecular similarity, neural networks and GNINA docking.Future medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HIV-1 (human immunodeficiency virus-1) has been causing severe pandemics by attacking the immune system of its host. Left untreated, it can lead to AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome), where death is inevitable due to opportunistic diseases. Therefore, discovering new antiviral drugs against HIV-1 is crucial. This study aimed to explore a novel machine learning approach to classify compounds that inhibit HIV-1 integrase and screen the dataset of repurposing compounds. The present study had two main stages: selecting the best type of fingerprint or molecular descriptor using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and building a computational model based on machine learning. In the first stage, we calculated 16 different types of fingerprint or molecular descriptors from the dataset and used each of them as input features for 10 machine-learning models, which were evaluated through cross-validation. Then, a meta-analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to select the optimal fingerprint or molecular descriptor types. In the second stage, we constructed a model based on the optimal fingerprint or molecular descriptor type. This data followed the machine learning procedure, including data preprocessing, outlier handling, normalization, feature selection, model selection, external validation, and model optimization. In the end, an XGBoost model and RDK7 fingerprint were identified as the most suitable. The model achieved promising results, with an average precision of 0.928 ± 0.027 and an F1-score of 0.848 ± 0.041 in cross-validation. The model achieved an average precision of 0.921 and an F1-score of 0.889 in external validation. Molecular docking was performed and validated by redocking for docking power and retrospective control for screening power, with the AUC metrics being 0.876 and the threshold being identified at -9.71 kcal mol
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.