ArticleCurrent research in food science2024
Machine learning identification of edible vegetable oils from fatty acid compositions and hyperspectral images.
Article in Current research in food science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Food Fraud Detection Systems: A Critical Systematic Review of the Detection-Prevention Gap.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Computational Methods in the Detection of Asbestos Cement in Hyperspectral Images.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting the quality of cookies with oleogel as a shortening substitute using hyperspectral imaging and artificial intelligence.Current research in food science · 2025Article
- Integrating near-infrared hyperspectral imaging with machine learning and feature selection: Detecting adulteration of extra-virgin olive oil with lower-grade olive oils and hazelnut oil.Current research in food science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperspectral imaging analysis combined with machine learning was applied to identify eight edible vegetable oils, and its classification performance was compared with the chemical method based on fatty acid compositions. Furthermore, the degree of adulteration in vegetable oils was quantitatively investigated using machine learning-enabled hyperspectral approaches. The hyperspectral absorbance spectra of palm oil with a high degree of saturation were distinctly different from those of the other liquid oils. The flaxseed and olive oils exhibited the dominant hyperspectral intensities at 1170/1671 and 1212/1415 nm, respectively. Linear discriminant analysis demonstrated that two linear discriminants could explain a significant portion of the total variability, accounting for 96.0% (fatty acid compositions) and 98.9% (hyperspectral images). When the hyperspectral results were used as datasets for three machine learning models (decision tree, random forest, and k-nearest neighbor), several instances to incorrectly classify grapeseed and sunflower oils were detected, while olive, palm, and flaxseed oils were successfully identified. The machine learning models showed a great classification performance that exceeded 98.9% from the hyperspectral images of the vegetable oils, which was comparable to the fatty acid composition-based chemical method in identifying edible vegetable oils. In addition, the random forest model was the most effective in ascertaining adulteration levels in binary oil blends (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.