Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708100›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2024

Machine learning identification of edible vegetable oils from fatty acid compositions and hyperspectral images.

Jeongin Hwang, Kyeong-Ok Choi, Sungmin Jeong, Suyong Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeongin HwangDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoul, 05006, South Korea.
Kyeong-Ok ChoiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, South Korea.
Sungmin JeongCarbohydrate Bioproduct Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul, 05006, South Korea.
Suyong LeeDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoul, 05006, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperspectral imaging analysis combined with machine learning was applied to identify eight edible vegetable oils, and its classification performance was compared with the chemical method based on fatty acid compositions. Furthermore, the degree of adulteration in vegetable oils was quantitatively investigated using machine learning-enabled hyperspectral approaches. The hyperspectral absorbance spectra of palm oil with a high degree of saturation were distinctly different from those of the other liquid oils. The flaxseed and olive oils exhibited the dominant hyperspectral intensities at 1170/1671 and 1212/1415 nm, respectively. Linear discriminant analysis demonstrated that two linear discriminants could explain a significant portion of the total variability, accounting for 96.0% (fatty acid compositions) and 98.9% (hyperspectral images). When the hyperspectral results were used as datasets for three machine learning models (decision tree, random forest, and k-nearest neighbor), several instances to incorrectly classify grapeseed and sunflower oils were detected, while olive, palm, and flaxseed oils were successfully identified. The machine learning models showed a great classification performance that exceeded 98.9% from the hyperspectral images of the vegetable oils, which was comparable to the fatty acid composition-based chemical method in identifying edible vegetable oils. In addition, the random forest model was the most effective in ascertaining adulteration levels in binary oil blends (R

Indexed as

AIArtificial intelligenceClassificationFoodGas chromatography

Identifiers

PMID38708100
PMCPMC11066601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.