Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708088›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024

Effective glenoid track: A novel concept for shoulder instability.

Arora Manit, Shukla Tapish

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arora ManitDepartment of Orthopaedics Fortis Hospital, Sector 62, Jail Road, Mohali, Punjab, 160062, India.
Shukla TapishDepartment of Orthopaedics Fortis Hospital, Sector 62, Jail Road, Mohali, Punjab, 160062, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Assessment and quantification of bone loss in cases of shoulder instability is critical for surgical decision making. The glenoid track concept was initially developed to assess Hill Sachs lesions taking into account the native glenoid diameter of the contralateral shoulder and assessing the degree of glenoid bone loss. However, it can not be reverse calculated to determine the effect of an addition of a bone block. We have developed a novel model to help address this problem yielding an "effective glenoid track" (EGT). Methods: Begin as we always do by using Itoi's concept for assessment of tracking based on the CT scan cuts Conclusion: The EGT allows for calculation of residual tracking of Hill Sachs lesions post a bone block addition and will aid in surgical decision making.

Indexed as

Glenoid bone lossGlenoid trackShoulder instability

Identifiers

PMID38708088
PMCPMC11067461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.