Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708057›Full record

ArticleAphasiology2024

Muddles and puzzles: Metaphor use associated with disease progression in Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Anna Volkmer, Jade Cartwright, Leanne Ruggero, Maria Loizidou, Chris Jd Hardy, Deborah Hersh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aphasiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna VolkmerPsychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4149-409X
Jade CartwrightSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6381-6184
Leanne RuggeroSchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8278-8174
Maria LoizidouPsychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9436-6360
Chris Jd HardyDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4900-6492
Deborah HershCurtin School of Allied Health, and Curtin enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2466-0225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Primary Progressive Aphasia describes a language-led dementia and its variants. There is little research exploring the experiences of living with this disease. Metaphor, words that represent something else, have been studied extensively in health-related narratives to gain a more intimate insight into health experiences. Aims: This study explored the metaphors used spontaneously by people with PPA, their care partners (family), and speech and language therapists/pathologists (SLT/Ps) providing support along the continuum of care. Methods & Procedures: This study examined two previously collected data sets comprising naturalistic talk where metaphors were not the specific focus, the first from focus groups conducted with people with PPA and their families and the second from focus groups conducted with SLT/Ps working with people with PPA. Transcribed data were analysed for metaphor use through an iterative narrative approach. Outcomes & Results: In all, 237 examples of metaphorical language were identified in the data, with 14 metaphors from people with PPA, 116 from the families and 106 from SLT/Ps. Different metaphors were used by participants to describe their experiences depending on which variant of PPA they were living with, and people also described their disease differently over time. SLT/Ps also used metaphors, however, their language reflected the structured, professional perspective of delivering speech and language therapy services. Conclusions & Implications: SLT/Ps should listen for and recognise the metaphorical language used by people with PPA and their families to ensure therapeutic alignment, see beyond the PPA to recognise the individual's needs, and provide person-centred and empathic support.

Indexed as

dementialanguageMetaphorPrimary progressive aphasiaspeech and language therapy

Identifiers

PMID38708057
PMCPMC11068082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.