Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708032›Full record

ArticleHealth open research2023

Protocol for the development and validation of a patient reported measure (PRM) of treatment burden in stroke.

Katie I Gallacher, Martin Taylor-Rowan, David T Eton, Hamish McLeod, Lisa Kidd, Karen Wood, Aleema Sardar, Terry J Quinn, Frances S Mair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katie I GallacherGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, G12 8TB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8620-8758
Martin Taylor-RowanGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, G12 8TB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3027-5369
David T EtonOutcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA.
Hamish McLeodMental Health and Wellbeing, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, G12 0XH, UK.
Lisa KiddDepartment of Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, G40BA, UK.
Karen WoodGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, G12 8TB, UK.
Aleema SardarSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Terry J QuinnInstitute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1401-0181
Frances S MairGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, G12 8TB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment burden is the workload of healthcare for people with long-term conditions and the impact on wellbeing. A validated measure of treatment burden after stroke is needed. We aim to adapt a patient-reported measure (PRM) of treatment burden in multimorbidity, PETS (Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-Management version 2.0), to create a stroke-specific measure, PETS-stroke. We aim to examine content validity, construct validity, reliability and feasibility in a stroke survivor population. Methods: 1) Adaptation of 60-item PETS to PETS-stroke using a taxonomy of treatment burden. 2) Content validity testing through cognitive interviews that will explore the importance, relevance and clarity of each item. 3) Evaluation of scale psychometric properties through analysis of data from stroke survivors recruited via postal survey (n=340). Factor structure will be tested with confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha will be used to index internal consistency. Construct validity will be tested against: The Stroke Southampton Self-Management Questionnaire; The Satisfaction with Stroke Care Measure; and The Shortened Stroke Impact Scale. We will explore known-groups validity by exploring the association between treatment burden, socioeconomic deprivation and multimorbidity. Test-retest reliability will be examined via re-administration after 2 weeks. Acceptability and feasibility of use will be explored via missing data rates and telephone interviews with 30 participants. Conclusions: We aim to create a validated PRM of treatment burden after stroke. PETS-stroke is designed for use as an outcome measure in clinical trials of stroke treatments and complex interventions to ascertain if treatments are workable for patients in the context of their everyday lives.

Indexed as

PETS-strokeStrokeTreatment BurdenValidity

Identifiers

PMID38708032
PMCPMC11064975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.