Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38708009›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Different Surgical Approaches for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Erica Kholinne, Leonard Christianto Singjie, Maria Anastasia, Felly Liu, Ira Juliet Anestessia, Jae-Man Kwak, In-Ho Jeon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07495254 (Effectiveness of Combined Super Inductive System), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07495254 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Combined Super Inductive System (SIS) Therapy With Therapeutic Physical Therapy Exercise and Health Education in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Vic - Central University of CataloniaRan2026 to 2028Enrolled224ConditionsLateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow), Lateral Epicondylalgia, Lateral Elbow TendinopathyArmsSuper Inductive System (SIS), therapeutic dose, Super Inductive System (SIS), non-therapeutic dose (active placebo), Therapeutic Exercise Program, Health Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Kinesio Taping, Wrist Splinting, and Epicondylitis Bandaging in Managing Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective Comparative Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erica KholinneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Carolus Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Leonard Christianto SingjieDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Carolus Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Maria AnastasiaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Carolus Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Felly LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic & Traumatology, Padjajaran University, Bandung, Indonesia.
Ira Juliet AnestessiaFaculty Of Medicine, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Jae-Man KwakDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, College of Medicine, Eulji University, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea.
In-Ho JeonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most common causes of lateral elbow pain. When nonoperative treatment fails, 1 of the 3 surgical approaches-open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic-is used. However, determining which approach has the superior clinical outcome remains controversial. Purpose: To review the outcomes of different operative modalities for LE qualitatively and quantitatively. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This review was performed and reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies published in PubMed, Medline (via EBSCO), and ScienceDirect databases that treated LE with open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic approaches with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score. The primary outcome was the success rate of each operative treatment approach-open, percutaneous, and arthroscopic. Results: From an initial search result of 603 studies, 43 studies (n = 1941 elbows) were ultimately included. The arthroscopic approach had the highest success rate (91.9% [95% CI, 89.2%-94.7%]) compared with the percutaneous (91% [95% CI, 87.3%-94.6%]) and open (82.7% [95% CI, 75.6%-89.8%]) approaches for LE surgery with changes in the mean visual analog scale pain score of 5.54, 4.90, and 3.63, respectively. According to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the functional outcome improved in the arthroscopic group (from 54.11 to 15.47), the percutaneous group (from 44.90 to 10.47), and the open group (from 53.55 to 16.13). The overall improvement was also found in the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the arthroscopic group (from 55.12 to 90.97), the percutaneous group (from 56.31 to 87.65), and the open group (from 64 to 93.37). Conclusion: Arthroscopic surgery had the highest rate of success and the best improvement in functional outcomes among the 3 approaches of LE surgery.

Indexed as

arthroscopiclateral epicondylitissurgical approachtennis elbow

Identifiers

PMID38708009
PMCPMC11067684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.