Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38707994›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2024

Estimation of contemporary effective population size in plant populations: Limitations of genomic datasets.

Roberta Gargiulo, Véronique Decroocq, Santiago C González-Martínez, Ivan Paz-Vinas, Jean-Marc Aury, Isabelle Lesur Kupin, Christophe Plomion, Sylvain Schmitt, Ivan Scotti, Myriam Heuertz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roberta GargiuloRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew Richmond UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8663-6568
Véronique DecroocqINRAE Univ. Bordeaux, UMR 1332 BFP Villenave d'Ornon France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6745-6350
Santiago C González-MartínezINRAE Univ. Bordeaux Cestas France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-889X
Ivan Paz-VinasDepartment of Biology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0043-9289
Jean-Marc AuryGénomique Métabolique, Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, CNRS, Univ Evry Université Paris-Saclay Evry France.
Isabelle Lesur KupinINRAE Univ. Bordeaux Cestas France.
Christophe PlomionINRAE Univ. Bordeaux Cestas France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3176-2767
Sylvain SchmittAMAP Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, IRD Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7759-7106
Ivan ScottiINRAE, URFM Avignon France.
Myriam HeuertzINRAE Univ. Bordeaux Cestas France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-3645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective population size (

Indexed as

conservation genomicseffective population sizeGONElinkage disequilibriumplants

Identifiers

PMID38707994
PMCPMC11069024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.