ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
Carbapenem-Resistant
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of third-generation cephalosporin and carbapenem resistance profiles on the mortality of patients withJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Characterization and transmission dynamics of carbapenemase-encoding genes in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae isolated from eight teaching hospitals in Guangdong province, China (2022-2024).BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- The clinical impact and dissemination of carbapenemase-producingMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Infections caused by clonal spread of metallo-beta-lactamase-producingMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-ProducingInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Fluoroquinolone resistance in ESKAPE pathogens: evolutionary pathways, one health transmission, and clinical surveillance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The isolation rate of carbapenem-resistant Methods: Bacterial species were identified using the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany), and the Results: 32 strains of CREC bacteria were isolated during the study, yet only 20 were retained for preservation. While the isolates demonstrated resistance to the majority of antibiotics, they exhibited high sensitivity to polymyxin B and tigecycline. All isolates carried the Conclusion: This study investigates the molecular characteristics and risk factors associated with CREC infections. The detection rate of CREC strains in our hospital is continuously rising and homology analysis suggested that strains might spread in our hospital, emphasizing the importance of implementing effective preventive measures to control the horizontal transmission of plasmid-mediated antimicrobial resistance genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.