ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024
Gait analysis of a kinematic retaining implant for Total knee replacements during walking and running.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Fixed Versus Rotating Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective 24-Month Longitudinal Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The analysis of gait is an important tool for evaluating postoperative outcomes of a Total Knee Replacement (TKR). There are few studies which have evaluated the gait parameters of a Kinematic retaining (Kr) prosthesis. This study therefore aims to investigate the kinetic and kinematic differences of running and walking, in the ankle, knee and hip joints in patients who underwent a Kr TKR. Methods: This study assessed the gait of 12 patients with physica lima Kr TKRs at 1 year follow up and 8 healthy controls using 3D video analysis. Data was collected on the kinetics and kinematics of walking and running at the ankle, knee and hip. Comparison was made between the operated and non-operated limbs of the patients, and between the operated and control limbs. Results: Gait analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the hip, ankle and knee angles or moments between the non-operated and operated legs during walking and running. However, there was a statistically significant difference between the knee angles of initial contact, maximum flexion during stance and swing in the TKR knees vs controls in walking and running. Similarly, there was also a statistically significantly higher max knee flexion moment between operated knees and controls in both walking and running. Conclusion: This study has shown that a quadriceps avoidance gait persists in patients after TKR, and that there was symmetry and reciprocated gait parameters in non-operated limbs. These findings suggest that Kr TKRs could be capable of replicating normal knee kinematics when running and walking.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.