ArticleJournal of education & teaching in emergency medicine2024
Vaginal Bleeding Due to Iatrogenic Uterine Perforation - A Case Report.
Article in Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine perforation is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of gynecologic procedures. Serious complications include hemorrhage, infection, and injury to surrounding organ systems (eg, gastrointestinal, urological, vascular, etc.). Risk factors include advanced maternal age, prior gynecologic surgeries, and other anatomical features that impact the difficulty of accessing the uterine cavity. In this case report, we discuss a patient who presented to the emergency department (ED) with diffuse abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding that occurred after an elective dilation and curettage (D&C) for a termination of pregnancy. The diagnosis was suspected clinically and confirmed by imaging including ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis. The patient was managed operatively with a multidisciplinary approach including Gynecology, General Surgery, and Urology. The patient was stabilized and eventually discharged. Uterine perforation should be included in the differential for patients with a history of recent gynecologic instrumentation presenting with abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding. The stabilization of these patients requires aggressive volume resuscitation, controlling the source of bleeding, and emergent surgical consultation. Topics: Gynecology, vaginal bleeding, ultrasound, computed tomography.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.