ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Anti-stigma interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Access, stigma and community engagement: implementation strategies for rural and underserved populations.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Public knowledge, stigma, and social acceptance toward mental illness in the Gulf region: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Assessing tuberculosis stigma: a pooled multi-country descriptive analysis of 17 high-burden countries using a standardised tool.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From stigma to support: Assessing the impact of school mental health literacy program in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Exploring the use of art interventions in challenging stigmas related to neurological disorders: A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- Investigating new opportunities to combat stigma in healthcare through a "universal" approach: findings from a longitudinal study of healthcare workers in Mombasa, Kenya.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Unbiased Artificial Intelligence: Addressing Bias in Computational Pathology.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Review
- Stigma measurement in health: a systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- Unravelling Migraine Stigma: A Comprehensive Review of Its Impact and Strategies for Change.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Intersectional inequity in knowledge, attitude, and testing related to HIV in Ethiopia: People with multiple disadvantages are left behind.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Stigma exacerbates power imbalances and societal disparities, significantly impacting diverse identities and health conditions, particularly for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Though crucial for dismantling harmful stereotypes, and enhancing healthcare utilisation, existing research on anti-stigma interventions is limited with its condition-focused approach. We aimed to thoroughly evaluate peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature for a comprehensive review of anti-stigma interventions for diverse identities and all health conditions in LMICs. Methods: This review systematically explored peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature, in ten electronic databases up to January 30, 2024, covering all anti-stigma interventions across various stigmatised identities and health conditions in LMICs. Quality assessment for this systematic review was conducted as per Cochrane Collaboration's suggested inclusions. The review was registered with PROSPERO (Registration: 2017 CRD42017064283). Findings: Systematic synthesis of the 192 included studies highlights regional imbalances, while providing valuable insights on robustness and reliability of anti-stigma research. Most studies used quasi-experimental design, and most centred on HIV/AIDS or mental health related stigma, with very little work on other issues. Certain high-population LMICs had no/little representation. Interpretation: The interventions targeted diverse segments of populations and consequently yielded a multitude of stigma-related outcomes. However, despite the heterogeneity of studies, most reported positive outcomes underscoring the effectiveness of existing interventions to reduce stigma. Funding: This study is supported by the UK Medical Research Council Indigo Partnership (MR/R023697/1) award.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.