Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38707876›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2024

Transperineal Ultrasound Evaluation of Bladder Parameters in Patients with Apical Prolapse Undergoing Lateral Suspension or Sacropexy.

Ezzat Sayed, Abubakr Mitwally, Ahmed Abdelmagied, Ahmed Fetih, Mohamed Fekry

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03772691 (Lateral Suspension Versus Sacropexy for Treatment of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03772691 nacompletednot on this map

Lateral Suspension Versus Sacropexy for Treatment of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled68ConditionsPelvic Organ ProlapseArmslateral suspension, sacropexy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ezzat SayedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's Health Hospital, Asyut University, Asyut, Egypt.
Abubakr MitwallyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's Health Hospital, Asyut University, Asyut, Egypt.
Ahmed AbdelmagiedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's Health Hospital, Asyut University, Asyut, Egypt.
Ahmed FetihDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's Health Hospital, Asyut University, Asyut, Egypt.
Mohamed FekryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's Health Hospital, Asyut University, Asyut, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0004-8061-368X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: and hypothesis.We evaluated different bladder parameters using Transperineal Ultrasound (TPUS) in patients with apical pelvic organ prolapse undergoing lateral suspension or sacropexy. Methods: We included 73 cases with 37 cases in lateral suspension (LS) group and 36 cases in sacropexy group. We enrolled cases with apical prolapse stage 2 or higher according to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q). Evaluation done of all cases using TPUS preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 18 months follow-up visits. Results: In LS group we found significant differences postoperatively in bladder neck height (Dy distance) at Valsalva and rest ( Conclusion: LS and sacropexy showed good postoperative improvement in some bladder parameters using TPUS with better improvement in bladder neck height in LS. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinical trial ID: NCT03772691.

Indexed as

Lateral suspensionPelvic organ prolapseSacropexyTransperineal ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38707876
PMCPMC11065794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.