ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2024
Impact of cachexia on disease recurrence and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer patients.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cancer cachexia is progressive weight loss due to muscle/adipose tissue wasting and inadequate intake that occurs in response to malignancy. It is an independent predictor of disease recurrence and reduced survival in several cancers. However, cachexia's relationship with gynecologic malignancy outcomes has only been examined in small studies with limited follow-up and inconsistent definitions of cachexia. This study investigated the impact of cachexia on disease recurrence and overall survival in high-risk endometrial carcinoma patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined data from patients with high-risk non-metastatic primary endometrial carcinoma treated at a single institution from 2015 to 2020. Treatment for all subjects included total hysterectomy, surgical staging, pelvic external beam radiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Radiation planning CT datasets were used to measure skeletal musculature at the L3 vertebral level. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was defined as total L3 skeletal muscle cross sectional area (cm Results: 55 patients were eligible for analysis. Several SMI thresholds were used to define cachexia, and analysis was performed for each definition. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis yielded no significant reduction in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with cachexia, regardless of threshold chosen. However, 4 of 13 definitions of cachexia showed significantly improved OS in patients without cachexia, relative to those with cachexia. There were no significant differences in disease recurrence. Conclusions: Cachexia as defined in this study was not associated with poor outcomes in endometrial carcinoma patients based on OS, PFS, or disease recurrence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.