Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38707798›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2024

Pregnancy and Family Planning in Women With Kidney Disease.

Joy Eskandar, Anika Lucas, Angelina Dixon, Jessica Kendrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joy EskandarDivision of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Anika LucasDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Angelina DixonDivision of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jessica KendrickDivision of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Females with kidney disease are at increased risk for pregnancy complications. Few studies have examined pregnancy perspectives of people with kidney disease. Our objective was to examine kidney patients' perspectives on family planning. Methods: We conducted an online survey of female patients with kidney disease from the University of Colorado Hospital between the ages of 18 and 50 years from August to October 2022. The survey asked questions on previous and current pregnancies with kidney disease, family planning, and reproductive health discussions with their nephrologists. Perspectives on how kidney disease influences pregnancies were also explored. Results: A total of 136 participants completed the survey. The majority of participants were White (71.3%) with a mean (SD) age of 37 ± 10 years. The majority of participants self-characterized their kidney disease as moderate ( Conclusion: Although kidney disease influenced family planning decisions, few participants had family planning discussions with their nephrologists.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasefamily planningkidney diseasepregnancypregnancy complicationsreproductive health

Identifiers

PMID38707798
PMCPMC11068963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.