ArticleCureus2024
Analyzing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Effects in HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Real World Data.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic impact of HER2 low expression in breast cancer subtypes from a Brazilian real-world cohort.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Factors influencing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER-2-low early-stage breast cancer and a predictive model for pathological complete response.Gland surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can be used as upfront therapy in aggressive breast cancer (BC). human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low BC, defined as tumors scoring +1 or +2 on immunohistochemistry without HER2 gene amplification by in situ hybridization, lacks information on real-world data (RWD) outcomes, especially in the NAC setting. This subgroup, which does not reach the HER2 positive criteria due to its lower receptor expression, represents a distinct clinical category potentially requiring tailored therapeutic approaches. STUDY
objectiveThe objective of this study is to characterize patients with BC with HER2-low status who received NAC in a Brazilian public reference center for female tumors and key outcomes such as pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival (OS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS).
methodsA retrospective cohort study based on a large BC database from a reference cancer center in Brazil. Patients with BC that received NAC, diagnosed between 2011 and 2020, were included if they presented HER2-low status (defined as tumors scoring +1 or +2 on immunohistochemistry without HER2 gene amplification by in situ hybridization) and had complete data on outcomes. Clinical and demographic data were collected, such as age, menopausal status, Ki-67, hormone receptor expression and others. Key outcomes from the study comprised pCR (defined as ypT0/TIs/ypN0), overall survival, and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Survival analyses were conducted through the semiparametric Kaplan-Meier method to assess OS and MFS by pCR status, considering BC diagnosis as the index date.
resultsOverall, 297 patients were eligible and 141 were included in the study after matching the HER2-low definition. The pCR was seen in 18 out of 141 patients (12.7%). The median overall survival was 8.2 years, and the median MFS was 2.7 years. The OS of pCR was 83.4% and non-pCR was 58.1%; the DFS of pCR was 55.5% and non-pCR 40.6%.
conclusionThis study gives updated insights on pCR, OS, and MFS in women with HER2-low BC exposed to NAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.