Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38707659›Full record

ReviewOpen respiratory archives

[Asthma].

Celia Pinedo Sierra, Elena Curto Sánchez, Rocio Diaz Campos, Tamara Hermida Valverde, Silvia Sánchez-Cuellar, Ana Fernández Tena

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Celia Pinedo SierraServicio de Neumología. Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos. Universidad Complutense, Madrid, España.
Elena Curto SánchezServicio de Neumología. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, España.
Rocio Diaz CamposU. de Asma Grave de Alta Complejidad. Servicio de Neumología. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España.
Tamara Hermida ValverdeServicio de Neumología. Hospital Central Universitario de Asturias, Oviedo, España.
Silvia Sánchez-CuellarServicio de Neumología. Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. IRYCIS, Madrid, España.
Ana Fernández TenaServicio de Neumología Ocupacional. Instituto Nacional de Silicosis, Oviedo, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects about 5% of the world's population and generates high health and social costs. Proper management of the disease requires a correct diagnosis, based on objective measures of functional impairment, as well as symptom control and assessment of the future risk of exacerbations.It has been estimated that 18% of asthma patients in Western Europe have severe asthma and approximately 50% of them have poor control. The severity of asthma is established based on the minimum maintenance treatment needs to achieve control. Asthma clinical practice guidelines recommend classifying severe patients into allergic asthma (T2); eosinophilic asthma (T2) and non-T2 asthma in order to establish the most appropriate treatment.In recent decades, new biological therapies have been developed that can be applied according to the phenotype and endotype of asthma, allowing for selective and personalized treatment. These phenotypes and endotypes can change over time and therefore, the identification of biomarkers capable of predicting the severity, the course of the disease and the response to a given treatment seems essential. A large number of biomarkers have been studied in asthma, but so far only a few can be readily used in routine clinical practice. The application of omics technologies (epigenomics, genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics, etc.) for this purpose is still in the research phase.

Indexed as

AsthmaBiologicsBiomarkersOccupational asthma

Identifiers

PMID38707659
PMCPMC11067451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.