ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2024
An evaluation of patient comfort levels during expression with a modified pumping program: a prospective proof of concept study.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04619212 (A Pre-market, Prospective, Comparative, Concept Proofing, Study Evaluating if Mothers Who Are Both Breastfeeding and Pumping in the First Days After Delivery Report Improved Comfort Levels With the New Symphony Program Card INITIATE 2.0 Program Compared With the Current Standard of Care, the Symphony Plus Program Card.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pre-market, Prospective, Comparative, Concept Proofing, Study Evaluating if Mothers Who Are Both Breastfeeding and Pumping in the First Days After Delivery Report Improved Comfort Levels With the New Symphony Program Card INITIATE 2.0 Program Compared With the Current Standard of Care, the Symphony Plus Program Card.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Milk Removal Efficiency and Maternal Perception Between a Hospital-Grade and Personal-Use Pump.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Associated factors of nipple fissures in early postpartum women: A retrospective case-control study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of a Modified Breast Pump Suction Pattern on Milk Yield During the Initiation of Lactation: A pilot study.The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to assess if the implementation of a gentle transition of vacuum mode into a breast pump suction pattern commonly used to initiate milk production would improve user comfort while expressing during the first four days postpartum. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at OLVG hospital in the Netherlands in two sequential phases. Breastfeeding patients delivering >36 weeks gestation with an infant aged ≤96 h old and a clinical indication to express milk with a breast pump were recruited. Intervention group 1 ( Results: The study found that the primary outcome of comfort was significantly improved with the modified breast pump suction pattern compared to the standard pattern (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.6) with 86% vs. 67% of participants not needing to reduce applied vacuum levels. The amount of milk expressed did not differ significantly between phases (group 1: 7.6 ml (2.7-25.5 ml), group 2: 12.0 ml (1.2-31.5 ml), Discussion: This study is the first to demonstrate an improvement in user comfort driven by the implementation of gentle transitions in vacuum modes in a commonly used breast pump suction pattern. Research into this novel population combining both pumping and breastfeeding in the first days after birth offers new unique insights on the requirements of breast pump suction patterns. Trial registration: Registered on clinical trials.gov NCT04619212. Date of registration November 6, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.