Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38707615›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2024

Advances in Nanotechnology for Enhancing the Solubility and Bioavailability of Poorly Soluble Drugs.

Yifan Liu, Yushan Liang, Jing Yuhong, Peng Xin, Jia Li Han, Yongle Du, Xinru Yu, Runhe Zhu, Mingxun Zhang, Wen Chen and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Optimized CoQ10 deliveryRSC advances · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative evaluation of quercetin, rutin, and their nanoparticles: enhanced antimicrobial and antioxidant activities.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yifan LiuSchool of Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Yushan LiangSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jing YuhongSchool of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-5508-8929
Peng XinSchool of Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jia Li HanSchool of Health Sciences, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-9284-7395
Yongle DuSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xinru YuSchool of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Runhe ZhuSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Mingxun ZhangSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Wen ChenFirst Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-8480-8112
Yingjie MaFirst Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript offers a comprehensive overview of nanotechnology's impact on the solubility and bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs, with a focus on BCS Class II and IV drugs. We explore various nanoscale drug delivery systems (NDDSs), including lipid-based, polymer-based, nanoemulsions, nanogels, and inorganic carriers. These systems offer improved drug efficacy, targeting, and reduced side effects. Emphasizing the crucial role of nanoparticle size and surface modifications, the review discusses the advancements in NDDSs for enhanced therapeutic outcomes. Challenges such as production cost and safety are acknowledged, yet the potential of NDDSs in transforming drug delivery methods is highlighted. This contribution underscores the importance of nanotechnology in pharmaceutical engineering, suggesting it as a significant advancement for medical applications and patient care.

Indexed as

Biological AvailabilityNanotechnologySolubilityAnimalsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesPharmaceutical PreparationsDrug CarriersPharmaceutical Preparationsdrug delivery systemsnanotechnologypharmaceutical engineeringpoorly soluble drugssolubility and bioavailability

Identifiers

PMID38707615
PMCPMC11070169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.